This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Two glibc homepages?
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
- To: Petr Baudis <pasky at suse dot cz>
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:00:52 -0500
- Subject: Re: Two glibc homepages?
- References: <20091229164529.GF2249@machine.or.cz>
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> wrote:
> ?I wonder, why is it necessary to keep two glibc homepages, an
> "official" one at GNU and "unofficial" one at sourceware.org? I've
> been confused by this multiple times and I have anecdotal evidence
> that others have been as well; this does not seem to be a common
> GNU project practice either, and it's hard to find out about the
> sourceware homepage from the GNU homepage. Would it be a problem
> to just update the gnu.org homepage with missing stuff?
That seems like a good suggestion.
> ?It seems that these are the extras at the sourceware.org page:
>
> ? ? ? ?* libc-locales mailing list link
> ? ? ? ?* the nice mailing list forms
> ? ? ? ?* link to mailing list archives in mbox format
> ? ? ? ?* link to the wiki
> ? ? ? ?* info about glibc-ports.git
> ? ? ? ?* link to the gitweb interface
> ? ? ? ?* the news section
>
> ?I can help if desired; I'm not sure how to work on the homepages
> however, I remember being told that they are in a git repository but
> I don't know what its address is.
I maintain both websites.
See:
http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/MAINTAINERS
If nobody objects I can do the following:
* merge the sourceware website into the fsf website
* redirect sourcware website via meta refresh to the fsf website
* have libc-alpha review the new fsf website
* if there are no objections we make the new fsf website live
Comments?
Cheers,
Carlos.