This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: glibc git tags


Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> writes:
>>> Here is the list of tags that are broken, together with the commit they
>>> are supposed to point to:
>>
>> Sigh.  Does everyone concur that this list is complete and correct?
>
> Note that I didn't bother to check the snapshot tags (which IMHO could
> be deleted without loss of information).
>
>> Now I am suspicious of all the cvs conversion stuff.
>
> Don't blame the cvs conversion.  The repository was already pretty much
> f***ed up to begin with (too many invalid direct repository
> manipulations).

Notice how Andreas' adjustments induce only small changes
in the dates.  I.e., they moved tags to nearby change sets.  I suspect
that those correspond to manual movement of tags in cvs, sort of like
what happened recently.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]