This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi Jakub, On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 00:44:09 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: ... > Not sure, but perhaps it would be more readable if the .eh_frame asm > wasn't in the macro, but just an extra asm () below the RESTORE. > There is just one RESTORE, you'd just add the nop and .LSTART_restore_rt > and .LEND_restore_rt symbols to the RESTORE macro, and you could get rid of > all the \'s at the end of the lines, #name uglification etc. > Perhaps the RESTORE macro could be dropped altogether, all we need > is something like CFI_STRINGIFY which would be defined unconditionally > and use it for the syscall number. > Guess Ulrich should decide how he wants it to look like. this idea was dropped as we discussed before. Other suggested changes were integrated. Minor .byte->.uleb128 length fix+change, I hope it does not violate the intended coding style. Tested with libunwind run-ptrace-stepper. Best Regards, Jan
Attachment:
glibc-signal-frame-unwind3.patch
Description: Text document
Attachment:
glibc-signal-frame-unwind-2-to-3.metapatch
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |