This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: inotify support.


On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 20:07 -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:

> The fact that these are the prototypes for the system calls doesn't
> necessarily mean we should use the same for the userlevel code.  The
> question is: is there the *potential* that any of the interfaces might
> need to be extended?  I think the only contender would be the MASK
> parameter of inotify_add_watch.  If yes, we probably should use
> something wider than a 32 bit type.

Requiring more than 32-bits would mean we triple the number of available
events.  I do not see that happening.

Also, the same 32-bit mask is in the inotify_event structure (see
include/linux/inotify.h in the kernel tree), so we would have to change
that, too--which is not going to happen.

So I think that we are good.

	Robert Love





Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]