This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking


On 2005-01-26, at 23:20, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:

   With the same version of gcc, and glibc even - *without* the
   patches that SuSE supplies.

Then it is SuSE's fault that they apply patches that make things
incompatible.  So go blame them instead.

I'm not 'blaming' anybody, just pointing out observations.

So point it out to the SuSE folks, because it isn't the problem of
glibc or gcc if SuSE applies patches that make things incompatible.

Uninformed that you are you are misguiding people to waist their time.
You have no clue. There is no "official" glibc release
out there remotely compatible with kernel 2.6 and gcc 3.4. Thus there isn't
anything out there SuSE could be incompatible with.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]