This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
- From: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
- To: Edward Peschko <esp5 at pge dot com>
- Cc: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>, alan at lxorguk dot ukuu dot org dot uk,gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:54:02 -0800
- Subject: Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking
- References: <41F5E862.2030906@kegel.com> <20050125195606.GA29787@venus> <41F72F7B.4070500@kegel.com> <20050126211549.GC29787@venus>
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 01:15:49PM -0800, Edward Peschko wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:49:47PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > Why are you replacing the system glibc? That's never a good idea.
>
> I'm not replacing the system glibc - all I am doing is making the point
> that *if* you compile glibc and run it against system binaries, the
> system binaries break.
This discussion is off-topic for the gcc list. Whether there are problems
with glibc or the LSB is a matter for other lists, not for gcc@gcc.gnu.org.