This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

DT_FLAG/FEATURE bits?


Is there any provision for processor-specific allocation of these
bits, or should I just look to add a new DT_ALPHA_FOO entry?

While re-doing the alpha trampoline code, I am shocked that I didn't,
back at the dawn of time, force the division routines to not use plt
entries.  Saving ~35 registers that otherwise don't need saving just
to let these 6 functions be lazy relocated doesn't seem like a good
tradeoff.  I'm pondering ways in which this might be fixed in a 
moderately backward-compatible manner.


r~


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]