This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Current binutils failed to build glibc

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>
Cc: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 20:06:02 +0200
Subject: Re: Current binutils failed to build glibc
References: <20041002010723.GY30497@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <200410020120.i921KK75023817@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 06:20:20PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Indeed.  The question seems to me, why is errno.os being taken from
> libc_pic.a at all?  There should be undefined reference that causes that
> object to be used from the archive.

Maybe it is not being taken from libc_pic.a at all, just ld when it
reads what symbols/objects it might need from libc_pic.a already complains.

	Jakub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Current binutils failed to build glibc
  - From: Roland McGrath

References:
- Re: Current binutils failed to build glibc
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Current binutils failed to build glibc
  - From: Roland McGrath

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]