This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: patches inline in mail
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm at osdl dot org>
- To: george at mvista dot com
- Cc: juhl-lkml at dif dot dk, clameter at sgi dot com, drepper at redhat dot com, johnstul at us dot ibm dot com, Ulrich dot Windl at rz dot uni-regensburg dot de, jbarnes at sgi dot com, linux-kernel at vger dot kernel dot org, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:29:28 -0700
- Subject: Re: patches inline in mail
- References: <B6E8046E1E28D34EB815A11AC8CA312902CD3264@mtv-atc-605e--n.corp.sgi.com><Pine.LNX.4.58.0409240508560.5706@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com><4154F349.1090408@redhat.com><Pine.LNX.4.58.0409242253080.13099@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com><41550B77.1070604@redhat.com><B6E8046E1E28D34EB815A11AC8CA312902CD327E@mtv-atc-605e--n.corp.sgi.com><Pine.LNX.4.58.0409271344220.32308@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com><4159B920.3040802@redhat.com><Pine.LNX.4.58.0409282017340.18604@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com><415AF4C3.1040808@mvista.com><Pine.LNX.4.58.0409291054230.25276@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com><415B0C9E.5060000@mvista.com><Pine.LNX.4.61.0409292143050.2744@dragon.hygekrogen.localhost><415B4FEE.2000209@mvista.com>
George Anzinger <george@mvista.com> wrote:
>
> We agree. Still, I have been bitten too many times by misshandled white space
> to trust pure inlineing. Likewise on picking it up one would usually past it in
> the mail (I suppose) where as the attachment is through the mailer and less
> prone to missing a character.
>
> The best answer, I think, is attachments that show as inline AND stay that way
> on the reply.
>
> Guild lines on how to insure this are welcome.
Send angry email to everyone@mozilla.org. AFAICT it's impossible with
recent mailnews.
Slightly more on-topic:
+int do_posix_clock_process_gettime(struct timespec *tp);
+int do_posix_clock_process_settime(struct timespec *tp);
+int do_posix_clock_thread_gettime(struct timespec *tp);
+int do_posix_clock_thread_settime(struct timespec *tp);
These should all be given static scope.
And it would be nice to structure the code so the forward decl isn't
needed, if poss.