This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Do not report build errors in bugzilla

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Cc: Paul Jarc <prj at po dot cwru dot edu>, GNU libc devel <libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 21:11:51 +0200
Subject: Re: Do not report build errors in bugzilla
References: <200408171951.i7HJpTbD009432@magilla.sf.frob.com> <m34qn15wph.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu> <41226DD9.40107@redhat.com>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 01:43:05PM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> Paul Jarc wrote:
> 
> > SUSv3 doesn't specify -e or -E for echo,
> 
> ...and still you send the patch using it.  I wrote before that a correct
> change would test for bash and use shopt to enable the xpg echo
> behavior.  Unless you care to follow this guidelines don't waste your
> time by sending patches which you know will not be excepted.

Isn't printf(1) more portable solution then?

	Jakub

References:
- Re: Do not report build errors in bugzilla
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: Do not report build errors in bugzilla
  - From: Paul Jarc
- Re: Do not report build errors in bugzilla
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]