This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] ppc setcontext should be GLIBC_2.0

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
To: Dwayne Grant McConnell <dgm69 at us dot ibm dot com>
Cc: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 11:42:01 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppc setcontext should be GLIBC_2.0
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
References: <Pine.WNT.4.61.0407221422020.1020@dwayne> <4100ADB3.2020800@redhat.com> <Pine.WNT.4.61.0407230828140.2540@dwayne>

Dwayne Grant McConnell wrote:

> Here is my original patch annotated to show where I think the ChangeLog
> entry and the patch itself were located. Is there something else I
> should have done?

You put the ChangeLog entry in the patch.  Never do that.  As you could
have seen from the postings to the list, everybody else has the
ChangeLog entries separately.  This is critical for you since this
broken mail system you're using requires the use of attachments to send
patches and the content is not visible in the mail body (in most mailers).

-- 
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] ppc setcontext should be GLIBC_2.0
  - From: Dwayne Grant McConnell

References:
- [PATCH] ppc setcontext should be GLIBC_2.0
  - From: Dwayne Grant McConnell
- Re: [PATCH] ppc setcontext should be GLIBC_2.0
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: [PATCH] ppc setcontext should be GLIBC_2.0
  - From: Dwayne Grant McConnell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]