This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: alpha vs complex functions

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>
Cc: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:11:44 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: alpha vs complex functions
References: <20040108235617.GA2916@twiddle.net> <20040112064134.GA21736@twiddle.net>

On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Richard Henderson wrote:

> This turned out to be remarkably self-contained.  The only thing
> I need is to move a couple of files from math/ to sysdeps/generic/
> so that I can override them from the alpha hierarchy.

Perhaps put a note in CONFORMANCE (that this sort of renaming prevents
using the functions without including the relevant header, which ISO C and
POSIX permit for functions that can be declared without using any type
defined in a header)?

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jsm@polyomino.org.uk

References:
- alpha vs complex functions
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: alpha vs complex functions
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]