This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Incorrect strfmon() formatting in glibc or standard example?

From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere at hungry dot com>
To: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: 02 Jan 2004 12:12:59 +0100
Subject: Re: Incorrect strfmon() formatting in glibc or standard example?
References: <E1A0F39-0007O1-00@minerva.hungry.com>
Reply-by: Tue, 1 Jan 1801 04:37:40 +1000

[Petter Reinholdtsen, 2003-09-19]
> Do you agree that glibc make most sense, and that the standard example
> should be changed?

I got no reply, so I decided to report it as a bug against the POSIX
standard.  The bug report is available from 
<URL:http://www.opengroup.org/sophocles/show_mail.tpl?source=L&listname=austin-review-l&id=1750>

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]