This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libc-base patch status

From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Cc: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot med dot uc dot edu>, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 14:10:38 -0700
Subject: Re: libc-base patch status
References: <200306141811.OAA19815@bromo.msbb.uc.edu><3EEB747E.3030102@redhat.com> <20030614203405.GA6390@lucon.org><3EEB89A5.2050402@redhat.com>

On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 01:46:29PM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> H. J. Lu wrote:
> 
> > Unspecified base version is documented in ld info pages:
> > [...]
> 
> I don't know who came up with this.  It is not the right way.
> Supporting this might very well cause problems for the correct way do
> handle newly versioned DSOs.

Can you elaborate?


H.J.

References:
- libc-base patch status
  - From: Jack Howarth
- Re: libc-base patch status
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: libc-base patch status
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: libc-base patch status
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]