This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: openoffice 1.0.1 vs glibc cvs

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Robert Love <rml at tech9 dot net>
Cc: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot med dot uc dot edu>, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:15:10 +0100
Subject: Re: openoffice 1.0.1 vs glibc cvs
References: <200211040434.XAA33448@bromo.msbb.uc.edu> <200211040447.XAA32658@bromo.msbb.uc.edu> <1036386177.744.109.camel@phantasy>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 12:02:57AM -0500, Robert Love wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-11-03 at 23:47, Jack Howarth wrote:
> 
> >    This is a stock RedHat 8.0 machine with which glibc?
> 
> Whatever it is stock 8.0 comes with - a pre-2.3.0, 2.2.93 as they call
> it.
> 
> > I don't recall seeing this until fairly recently with
> > post glibc 2.3.1 cvs. At least it seems that way.
> 
> Shrug.  It happens to me, too - I open an Open Office program and
> sometimes it just disappears after the splash screen.  Works like a
> charm on the second try.

Works just fine for me. Can you ulimit -c unlimited and get some backtrace
why it died?

	Jakub

References:
- openoffice 1.0.1 vs glibc cvs
  - From: Jack Howarth
- Re: openoffice 1.0.1 vs glibc cvs
  - From: Jack Howarth
- Re: openoffice 1.0.1 vs glibc cvs
  - From: Robert Love

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]