libc-alpha archive
author index for October, 2002

This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

(¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.->

• 2002-10-04 09:35 GANA VERDADERAMENTE

101.6538

• 2002-10-29 08:53 x-4-you

Frédéric L. W. Meunier

• 2002-10-03 11:57 kernel-features.h: Comment typo ?
• 2002-10-16 16:29 Re: [Patch] Missing patch in the gcc-3.2 / glibc-2.3 compatablity patch

adaline4u@highstream.net

• 2002-10-05 19:28 HEY! WHY DON'T YOU EMAIL ME ANYMORE!

Akim Demaille

• 2002-10-22 05:40 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-23 00:51 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-23 03:34 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-24 02:32 removing the old build/host/target compatibility code (Was: current glibc vs debian sid)

Aldy Hernandez

• 2002-10-01 15:31 changiing rtld.c
• 2002-10-01 15:59 Re: changiing rtld.c
• 2002-10-08 11:14 soft-fp fixes
• 2002-10-08 11:56 ppc completely soft patches
• 2002-10-10 22:38 Re: problems with 2.3.1pre[12]?
• 2002-10-17 16:31 Re: ppc completely soft patches
• 2002-10-18 16:08 Re: ppc completely soft patches
• 2002-10-18 23:35 Re: still building soft-fp on ppclinux
• 2002-10-18 23:40 Re: still building soft-fp on ppclinux
• 2002-10-19 15:23 Re: still building soft-fp on ppclinux
• 2002-10-19 16:40 Re: still building soft-fp on ppclinux
• 2002-10-20 10:53 Re: new long double code on ppc
• 2002-10-21 17:58 Re: still building soft-fp on ppclinux
• 2002-10-21 17:59 Re: still building soft-fp on ppclinux

Alexandre Duret-Lutz

• 2002-10-23 16:10 Re: current glibc vs debian sid

Alexandre Oliva

• 2002-10-08 12:56 Re: glibc cvs broken?
• 2002-10-08 14:54 Re: glibc cvs broken?
• 2002-10-14 09:27 Re: ia64 does not build

Andreas Jaeger

• 2002-10-02 04:58 Re: [PATCH] ppc64 utmp changes
• 2002-10-03 03:42 Re: glibc 2.3
• 2002-10-04 07:06 Re: prelinking speed
• 2002-10-04 07:23 Re: prelinking speed
• 2002-10-07 12:06 Re: optimization/8156 (bad assembler code)
• 2002-10-08 07:54 Re: [PATCH] ppc64 utmp changes
• 2002-10-09 06:50 Re: [Patch] glibc-2.3 compile --with-tls using gcc-3.2 unpached
• 2002-10-14 01:58 Re: glibc 2.3 on linux-mips
• 2002-10-17 03:01 Re: libio
• 2002-10-25 07:47 Re: Making Glibc binaries*smaller*
• 2002-10-31 01:20 Re: bug-wfflush.out Error 1

Andreas Schwab

• 2002-10-07 03:06 Re: glibc cvs broken?
• 2002-10-07 07:01 Re: glibc cvs broken?
• 2002-10-07 07:39 Re: glibc cvs broken?
• 2002-10-09 01:40 Re: glibc cvs broken?
• 2002-10-14 07:20 ia64 does not build
• 2002-10-18 02:11 Re: glibc cvs broken?
• 2002-10-18 04:00 Re: glibc cvs broken?
• 2002-10-22 07:01 Bad regex matcher
• 2002-10-29 00:52 Re: libc 2.3 and RT signals broken
• 2002-10-29 04:16 Re: libc 2.3 and RT signals broken
• 2002-10-29 14:33 Re: Linux getdents.c is not aliasing safe

Andrew Walrond

• 2002-10-03 06:10 Re: about RHL8 including glibc-2.2.93

Anton Blanchard

• 2002-10-01 06:21 Re: [PATCH] ppc32 dl-machine.c

Arkadiusz Miskiewicz

• 2002-10-03 11:49 Re: ldconfig miscompile on i386
• 2002-10-04 01:59 Re: Is 2.3 really binary compatible?

Art Haas

• 2002-10-18 09:54 [PATCH] configure.in tweaks for autoconf-2.5X
• 2002-10-18 12:50 Re: [PATCH] configure.in tweaks for autoconf-2.5X
• 2002-10-18 13:14 [PATCH] Replace AC_FD_MSG and AC_FD_CC in configure.in
• 2002-10-18 13:16 Re: [PATCH] configure.in tweaks for autoconf-2.5X
• 2002-10-18 17:21 [PATCH] Remove a couple of AC_FD_CC macros still in configure.in
• 2002-10-19 17:07 [PATCH] Use AC_HELP_STRING macro to configure.in

ataruataru

• 2002-10-08 04:15 $BL$>5Bz9-9p"(7|>^(B4000$B7o0J>e<+F0F~NO1~Jg(B($BAm3[(B1$B2/1_0J>e(B!)$B$G$-$k=i$a$F$N%5%$%HEP>l!*(B

Ben Collins

• 2002-10-01 07:37 Re: [PATCH] ppc64 utmp changes
• 2002-10-03 07:54 Re: ldconfig miscompile on i386
• 2002-10-03 11:29 Re: ldconfig miscompile on i386

Bonzini

• 2002-10-02 00:00 GNU sed 3.95 released
• 2002-10-05 02:25 Re: GNU sed 3.95 released
• 2002-10-16 15:03 Regex failure
• 2002-10-22 14:57 [PATCH] Speed up backreferences
• 2002-10-23 01:01 More backreference performance improvements
• 2002-10-23 03:03 More backref performance - no strncmp
• 2002-10-23 03:04 More backreference performance improvements [take 2]
• 2002-10-25 01:19 re: More backreference performance improvements [take 2]
• 2002-10-28 11:01 [RFC] i386 memcmp implementation
• 2002-10-28 11:14 [i386] memcmp very slow
• 2002-10-28 11:18 Re: More backreference performance improvements [take 2]
• 2002-10-29 12:58 Re: [RFC] i386 memcmp implementation and gcc builtin

Boris

• 2002-10-25 07:19 Making Glibc binaries*smaller*

Bruno Haible

• 2002-10-02 06:28 an FAQ
• 2002-10-02 07:12 Re: an FAQ
• 2002-10-15 10:28 Re: [Patch] Missing patch in the gcc-3.2 / glibc-2.3 compatablity patch
• 2002-10-17 08:00 Re: libio
• 2002-10-18 04:53 wrong character names in charmaps
• 2002-10-18 04:54 update ISO_5428 charmap
• 2002-10-18 06:13 FreeBSD port (59): new meta files
• 2002-10-18 06:28 FreeBSD port (60): system calls
• 2002-10-18 06:33 FreeBSD port (61): basic types
• 2002-10-18 14:50 Re: FreeBSD port (60): system calls
• 2002-10-18 14:54 Re: FreeBSD port (61): basic types
• 2002-10-18 19:08 Re: FreeBSD port (59): new meta files
• 2002-10-18 20:21 FreeBSD port (62): sys/sysmacros.h
• 2002-10-30 11:56 Re: iconv problem

Carlos O'Donell

• 2002-10-01 12:16 [PATCH] glibc 2.2.94 - hppa - min kernel and unwind-find-fde
• 2002-10-01 12:16 [PATCH] glibc 2.2.94 - hppa - data start
• 2002-10-01 12:16 [PATCH] glibc 2.2.94 - hppa - mcontext
• 2002-10-01 12:35 [PATCH] glibc 2.2.94 - hppa - fcntl
• 2002-10-01 12:51 [PATCH] glibc 2.2.94 - hppa - fcntl64
• 2002-10-01 17:27 Re: [PATCH] glibc 2.2.94 - hppa - fcntl64
• 2002-10-01 17:31 Re: [PATCH] glibc 2.2.94 - hppa - min kernel and unwind-find-fde

Christoph Lameter

• 2002-10-05 00:31 glibc 2.3 not binary compatible with glibc-2.2.5
• 2002-10-05 07:58 Re: glibc 2.3 not binary compatible with glibc-2.2.5
• 2002-10-05 08:25 Re: glibc 2.3 not binary compatible with glibc-2.2.5
• 2002-10-05 09:37 Re: glibc 2.3 not binary compatible with glibc-2.2.5
• 2002-10-05 12:24 Re: glibc 2.3 not binary compatible with glibc-2.2.5
• 2002-10-05 13:14 Re: glibc 2.3 not binary compatible with glibc-2.2.5
• 2002-10-05 13:30 Re: glibc 2.3 not binary compatible with glibc-2.2.5
• 2002-10-05 14:22 Re: glibc 2.3 not binary compatible with glibc-2.2.5
• 2002-10-05 15:09 Re: glibc 2.3 not binary compatible with glibc-2.2.5
• 2002-10-05 22:58 Re: glibc 2.3 not binary compatible with glibc-2.2.5
• 2002-10-06 21:16 undefined reference to __ctype_tolower etc in build of glib, gcc,pam + sed-3.58 strangeness + bzip2
• 2002-10-07 07:45 Re: undefined reference to __ctype_tolower etc in build of glib,gcc, pam + sed-3.58 strangeness + bzip2
• 2002-10-07 08:05 Re: undefined reference to __ctype_tolower etc in build of glib,gcc, pam + sed-3.58 strangeness + bzip2
• 2002-10-07 08:27 Re: undefined reference to __ctype_tolower etc in build of glib,gcc, pam + sed-3.58 strangeness + bzip2
• 2002-10-07 11:43 Re: undefined reference to __ctype_tolower etc in build of glib,gcc, pam + sed-3.58 strangeness + bzip2
• 2002-10-07 16:45 Re: undefined reference to __ctype_tolower etc in build of glib,gcc, pam + sed-3.58 strangeness + bzip2
• 2002-10-09 10:59 Re: undefined reference to __ctype_tolower etc in build of glib,gcc, pam + sed-3.58 strangeness + bzip2

Daniel Jacobowitz

• 2002-10-01 16:07 Re: changiing rtld.c
• 2002-10-05 08:05 Re: glibc 2.3 not binary compatible with glibc-2.2.5
• 2002-10-05 13:24 Re: glibc 2.3 not binary compatible with glibc-2.2.5
• 2002-10-07 07:49 Re: undefined reference to __ctype_tolower etc in build of glib, gcc, pam + sed-3.58 strangeness + bzip2
• 2002-10-12 12:21 Re: cross compiling does not work
• 2002-10-23 08:26 Re: More backref performance - no strncmp
• 2002-10-25 21:47 Re: PATCH: Fix errlist for mips
• 2002-10-26 11:14 Re: PATCH: Fix errlist for mips
• 2002-10-27 09:05 [donut@azstarnet.com: Bug#166488: on regexec borkage in libc 2.3.1-3]
• 2002-10-28 18:39 libc 2.3 and RT signals broken
• 2002-10-28 19:20 Re: libc 2.3 and RT signals broken
• 2002-10-29 10:58 Problem with crypt_r and a dirty crypt_data
• 2002-10-29 13:57 Linux getdents.c is not aliasing safe
• 2002-10-29 17:03 Re: Linux getdents.c is not aliasing safe

Denis Vlasenko

• 2002-10-09 23:34 Re: Problem compiling glibc-linuxthreads-2.3
• 2002-10-15 22:37 Statically linked binary way way too big
• 2002-10-15 23:30 Re: Statically linked binary way way too big
• 2002-10-16 00:32 Re: Statically linked binary way way too big
• 2002-10-16 00:37 Re: Statically linked binary way way too big
• 2002-10-16 00:38 Re: Statically linked binary way way too big
• 2002-10-17 00:40 Re: Statically linked binary way way too big
• 2002-10-24 23:49 Csum and csum copyroutines benchmark

Falk Hueffner

• 2002-10-11 09:21 Stripping libc on Alpha
• 2002-10-11 09:47 Re: Stripping libc on Alpha
• 2002-10-11 16:10 Re: Stripping libc on Alpha

Felix von Leitner

• 2002-10-12 12:17 cross compiling does not work
• 2002-10-12 14:55 [MAILER-DAEMON@sourceware.org: failure notice]

Franz Sirl

• 2002-10-06 02:38 Re: [PATCH] Complete PPC INLINE_SYSCALL macro
• 2002-10-18 07:30 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-18 07:44 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-18 13:01 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-18 13:06 Re: ppc completely soft patches
• 2002-10-22 06:34 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-23 03:21 Re: current glibc vs debian sid

Geoff Keating

• 2002-10-16 11:22 Re: Statically linked binary way way too big
• 2002-10-29 17:14 Re: Linux getdents.c is not aliasing safe

Glen Nakamura

• 2002-10-04 01:43 glibc-2.3 alpha stxncpy.S

GOTO Masanori

• 2002-10-28 19:13 Re: libc 2.3 and RT signals broken
• 2002-10-28 19:37 Re: libc 2.3 and RT signals broken

Graham Murray

• 2002-10-05 12:36 Re: glibc 2.3

Greg Schafer

• 2002-10-03 14:53 Is 2.3 really binary compatible?
• 2002-10-03 15:13 Re: Is 2.3 really binary compatible?
• 2002-10-03 20:59 Re: Is 2.3 really binary compatible?
• 2002-10-06 00:01 More info on static binary/libnss* mystery
• 2002-10-06 05:04 Re: More info on static binary/libnss* mystery
• 2002-10-07 01:04 Re: More info on static binary/libnss* mystery

Guido Guenther

• 2002-10-06 16:15 glibc 2.3 on linux-mips
• 2002-10-12 10:20 Re: glibc 2.3 on linux-mips
• 2002-10-12 10:26 Re: glibc 2.3 on linux-mips
• 2002-10-14 01:34 Re: glibc 2.3 on linux-mips
• 2002-10-16 10:35 Re: glibc 2.3 on linux-mips
• 2002-10-17 01:47 Re: glibc 2.3 on linux-mips
• 2002-10-19 09:41 Re: glibc 2.3 on linux-mips
• 2002-10-20 13:37 libgcc-compat for linux-mips
• 2002-10-20 14:18 Re: libgcc-compat for linux-mips
• 2002-10-20 14:40 Re: libgcc-compat for linux-mips
• 2002-10-20 15:36 Re: libgcc-compat for linux-mips
• 2002-10-21 10:46 Re: glibc 2.3 on linux-mips

H. J. Lu

• 2002-10-02 10:24 The untested Linux binutils 2.13.90.0.6
• 2002-10-02 10:25 Re: The untested Linux binutils 2.13.90.0.6
• 2002-10-03 09:31 Re: glibc 2.3 --host powerpc-linux --build i686-linux Build Failure
• 2002-10-06 16:24 Re: glibc 2.3 on linux-mips
• 2002-10-09 09:15 Re: [Patch] glibc-2.3 compile --with-tls using gcc-3.2 unpached
• 2002-10-09 10:15 The Linux binutils 2.13.90.0.8 is released for ia32
• 2002-10-10 10:31 The Linux binutils 2.13.90.0.10 is available for testing
• 2002-10-11 09:31 Re: Stripping libc on Alpha
• 2002-10-11 09:49 Re: Stripping libc on Alpha
• 2002-10-11 22:50 The Linux binutils 2.13.90.0.10 is released
• 2002-10-12 10:12 PATCH: Cleanup sunrpc/thrsvc.c
• 2002-10-14 17:02 C ABI changes between gcc 2.96 and gcc 3.2?
• 2002-10-14 21:11 Re: C ABI changes between gcc 2.96 and gcc 3.2?
• 2002-10-18 15:21 Re: Statically linked binary way way too big
• 2002-10-18 16:59 Treat weak as strong in DSO?
• 2002-10-18 17:52 Re: [Fwd: Overriding glibc functions]
• 2002-10-18 23:01 Re: [Fwd: Overriding glibc functions]
• 2002-10-20 14:08 Re: libgcc-compat for linux-mips
• 2002-10-20 14:26 Re: libgcc-compat for linux-mips
• 2002-10-20 14:55 Re: libgcc-compat for linux-mips
• 2002-10-20 14:58 Re: libgcc-compat for linux-mips
• 2002-10-20 15:38 Re: libgcc-compat for linux-mips
• 2002-10-20 16:43 sysdeps/gnu/errlist-compat.awk doesn't work on mips
• 2002-10-20 17:23 PATCH: Fix errlist for mips
• 2002-10-20 20:40 Re: libgcc-compat for linux-mips
• 2002-10-21 08:11 Re: libgcc-compat for linux-mips
• 2002-10-24 06:48 Re: Performance problem of dlopen
• 2002-10-24 08:26 Re: Performance problem of dlopen
• 2002-10-25 09:12 Re: Making Glibc binaries*smaller*
• 2002-10-25 16:41 Re: PATCH: Fix errlist for mips
• 2002-10-25 20:28 Re: Performance problem of dlopen
• 2002-10-25 21:55 Re: PATCH: Fix errlist for mips
• 2002-10-26 11:20 Re: PATCH: Fix errlist for mips

info@pedalmagic.co.uk

• 2002-10-27 07:39 Teach anyone to ride a bike..in minutes

Isamu Hasegawa

• 2002-10-17 04:14 Re: Regex failure
• 2002-10-21 06:27 [PATCH] regex bug fix for gawk
• 2002-10-23 00:39 Re: Bad regex matcher
• 2002-10-23 01:02 Re: [PATCH] Speed up backreferences
• 2002-10-28 03:16 Re: More backreference performance improvements [take 2]
• 2002-10-30 05:27 Re: More backreference performance improvements [take 2]

Jack Howarth

• 2002-10-02 17:24 Re: The untested Linux binutils 2.13.90.0.6
• 2002-10-03 10:45 version.h
• 2002-10-03 15:57 Re: Is 2.3 really binary compatible?
• 2002-10-03 19:55 db1 vs glibc 2.3
• 2002-10-03 20:07 Re: db1 vs glibc 2.3
• 2002-10-03 21:01 home for prelink
• 2002-10-04 06:25 Re: Is 2.3 really binary compatible?
• 2002-10-04 06:29 prelinking speed
• 2002-10-04 07:06 Re: prelinking speed
• 2002-10-04 08:09 Re: prelinking speed
• 2002-10-04 08:28 Re: prelinking speed
• 2002-10-04 09:54 Re: prelinking speed
• 2002-10-05 06:46 prelinking j2sdk?
• 2002-10-07 16:34 Re: undefined reference to __ctype_tolower etc in build of glib,gcc, pam + sed-3.58 strangeness + bzip2
• 2002-10-08 18:08 has undefined non-weak symbols
• 2002-10-09 21:17 re: glibc 2.3.1pre1
• 2002-10-10 19:30 Re: problems with 2.3.1pre[12]?
• 2002-10-12 12:15 glibc cvs vs sshd
• 2002-10-12 12:30 Re: glibc cvs vs sshd
• 2002-10-14 18:41 io/test-utime.out
• 2002-10-16 21:12 glibc cvs failure on ppclinux
• 2002-10-17 06:38 regex warnings
• 2002-10-17 07:03 charmap-dir warning
• 2002-10-17 09:01 Re: glibc cvs failure on ppclinux
• 2002-10-17 17:05 current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-17 17:53 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-17 18:26 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-17 19:54 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-17 20:28 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-17 20:35 sysdeps/powerpc/soft-fp/soft-supp.h dropped
• 2002-10-17 21:48 even more debian ppc sid build problems
• 2002-10-18 06:11 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-18 06:32 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-18 07:34 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-18 07:41 sysdeps/powerpc/soft-fp unprotected
• 2002-10-18 07:47 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-18 15:34 glibc ppc build broken
• 2002-10-18 16:45 still building soft-fp on ppclinux
• 2002-10-18 17:13 Re: still building soft-fp on ppclinux
• 2002-10-18 17:37 Re: still building soft-fp on ppclinux
• 2002-10-18 18:01 fpu vs soft-fpu
• 2002-10-19 11:07 Re: still building soft-fp on ppclinux
• 2002-10-19 11:29 Re: still building soft-fp on ppclinux
• 2002-10-19 13:14 Re: still building soft-fp on ppclinux
• 2002-10-19 16:16 Re: still building soft-fp on ppclinux
• 2002-10-19 19:17 Re: still building soft-fp on ppclinux
• 2002-10-20 08:50 new long double code on ppc
• 2002-10-21 06:00 Re: libgcc-compat for linux-mips
• 2002-10-24 11:40 re: More backreference performance improvements [take 2]

Jakub Jelinek

• 2002-10-01 04:42 Re: [PATCH] ppc64 utmp changes
• 2002-10-01 04:56 Re: [PATCH] ppc64 utmp changes
• 2002-10-01 07:56 Re: [PATCH] ppc64 utmp changes
• 2002-10-02 05:15 Re: [PATCH] ppc64 utmp changes
• 2002-10-02 06:35 Re: an FAQ
• 2002-10-02 08:10 Re: [PATCH] ppc64 utmp changes
• 2002-10-02 08:42 Re: [PATCH] ppc64 utmp changes
• 2002-10-04 06:49 Re: prelinking speed
• 2002-10-04 07:14 Re: prelinking speed
• 2002-10-04 07:18 Re: prelinking speed
• 2002-10-04 07:23 Re: prelinking speed
• 2002-10-04 08:19 Re: prelinking speed
• 2002-10-05 11:15 Re: Problems with compiling glibc-2.3
• 2002-10-05 12:39 Re: glibc 2.3
• 2002-10-07 14:42 Re: optimization/8156 (bad assembler code)
• 2002-10-09 07:18 Re: [Patch] glibc-2.3 compile --with-tls using gcc-3.2 unpached
• 2002-10-09 16:01 Re: Problem compiling glibc-linuxthreads-2.3
• 2002-10-10 07:32 Re: binutils 2.13.90.0.4 and gcc-3.2: library conflict
• 2002-10-11 09:32 Re: Stripping libc on Alpha
• 2002-10-16 00:38 Re: Statically linked binary way way too big
• 2002-10-16 00:53 Re: Statically linked binary way way too big
• 2002-10-16 08:53 Re: Statically linked binary way way too big
• 2002-10-18 07:34 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-24 02:03 Re: More backref performance - no strncmp
• 2002-10-24 03:04 Re: Performance problem of dlopen
• 2002-10-24 05:36 Re: Performance problem of dlopen
• 2002-10-24 06:58 Re: Performance problem of dlopen
• 2002-10-24 09:43 Re: Performance problem of dlopen
• 2002-10-28 14:29 Re: [RFC] i386 memcmp implementation
• 2002-10-29 02:11 Re: libc 2.3 and RT signals broken
• 2002-10-30 03:04 Re: Linux getdents.c is not aliasing safe

James Antill

• 2002-10-15 23:22 Re: Statically linked binary way way too big
• 2002-10-31 07:02 Re: More backref performance - no strncmp

Jeff Bailey

• 2002-10-03 06:37 ldconfig miscompile on i386
• 2002-10-03 08:13 Re: ldconfig miscompile on i386
• 2002-10-08 13:05 Re: glibc cvs broken?
• 2002-10-10 18:52 Re: problems with 2.3.1pre[12]?
• 2002-10-11 09:38 Re: Stripping libc on Alpha
• 2002-10-12 05:44 Re: gcc 3.2 needed for everything?
• 2002-10-12 12:18 Re: glibc cvs vs sshd
• 2002-10-12 13:24 Reference to nonexistent node `Threads and Signal Handling'.
• 2002-10-16 10:30 Re: glibc 2.3 on linux-mips
• 2002-10-16 20:06 ldconfig failure
• 2002-10-17 05:22 Re: libio
• 2002-10-17 05:30 Re: ldconfig failure
• 2002-10-18 12:07 Reduce Stub Cruft
• 2002-10-18 12:23 Remove unneeded sinclude from configure fragments
• 2002-10-18 13:01 Re: [PATCH] configure.in tweaks for autoconf-2.5X
• 2002-10-18 13:19 Do not use obsolete AC_FD_CC Macro
• 2002-10-18 13:28 Re: [PATCH] configure.in tweaks for autoconf-2.5X
• 2002-10-18 13:48 Replace obsolete AC_LINK_FILES with AC_CONFIG_LINKS
• 2002-10-18 14:23 More cruft reduction in configure fragments
• 2002-10-18 15:09 Re: Remove unneeded sinclude from configure fragments
• 2002-10-18 15:14 Switching from obsolete AC_OUTPUT syntax
• 2002-10-21 18:51 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-22 09:31 glibc-2.3.2 release?
• 2002-10-25 07:56 Re: Making Glibc binaries*smaller*
• 2002-10-28 11:05 Re: [RFC] i386 memcmp implementation

Jeff Chua

• 2002-10-05 07:15 Re: glibc 2.3 not binary compatible with glibc-2.2.5

Jeremy Fitzhardinge

• 2002-10-18 18:49 Re: [Fwd: Overriding glibc functions]

Joerg Budischewski

• 2002-10-24 02:33 Performance problem of dlopen
• 2002-10-24 04:30 Re: Performance problem of dlopen
• 2002-10-25 07:42 Re: Performance problem of dlopen

Johannes Stezenbach

• 2002-10-16 06:19 [PATCH] mips-linux, static/non-PIC: errno is wrong
• 2002-10-23 07:28 Re: [PATCH] mips-linux, static/non-PIC: errno is wrong

Jordi Mallach

• 2002-10-18 03:43 Re: Adding unofficial languages support?

Joseph S. Myers

• 2002-10-14 17:36 Re: C ABI changes between gcc 2.96 and gcc 3.2?
• 2002-10-19 17:43 Re: charmap-dir warning

Kaoru Fukui

• 2002-10-02 00:33 glibc-2.3 development make, make check have done
• 2002-10-07 06:55 Re: glibc cvs broken?
• 2002-10-07 07:08 Re: glibc cvs broken?
• 2002-10-07 07:52 Re: glibc cvs broken?
• 2002-10-07 08:22 Re: undefined reference to __ctype_tolower etc in build of glib, gcc, pam + sed-3.58 strangeness + bzip2
• 2002-10-10 16:50 Re: problems with 2.3.1pre[12]?
• 2002-10-16 18:51 Success today's glibc-2.3.1cvs
• 2002-10-16 23:40 Re: glibc cvs failure on ppclinux
• 2002-10-16 23:58 Re: glibc cvs failure on ppclinux
• 2002-10-17 18:25 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-17 18:56 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-17 23:05 Re: even more debian ppc sid build problems
• 2002-10-21 16:10 problem setlocale in latest glibc and hope locale.alias
• 2002-10-22 03:35 Re: problem setlocale in latest glibc and hope locale.alias
• 2002-10-22 05:24 Re: problem setlocale in latest glibc and hope locale.alias
• 2002-10-22 18:36 Re: problem setlocale in latest glibc and hope locale.alias
• 2002-10-31 01:03 bug-wfflush.out Error 1
• 2002-10-31 01:51 Re: bug-wfflush.out Error 1
• 2002-10-31 01:58 Re: bug-wfflush.out Error 1
• 2002-10-31 02:59 Re: bug-wfflush.out Error 1
• 2002-10-31 12:57 Re: bug-wfflush.out Error 1

Kaz Kylheku

• 2002-10-16 00:24 Re: Statically linked binary way way too big

Keld Jørn Simonsen

• 2002-10-15 08:57 Re: glibc 2.3

Klaus Dittrich

• 2002-10-06 07:31 glibc-2.3-install
• 2002-10-14 02:50 stdio.h

Lars Brinkhoff

• 2002-10-24 22:04 _G_IO_NO_BACKWARD_COMPAT
• 2002-10-24 22:19 Re: _G_IO_NO_BACKWARD_COMPAT

lav

• 2002-10-31 23:35 re_search_2 bug with NULL reference

Marcus Brinkmann

• 2002-10-17 07:04 Re: libio
• 2002-10-17 12:51 Re: libio

Martin Schwidefsky

• 2002-10-01 06:08 Re: [PATCH] ppc64 utmp changes
• 2002-10-02 07:50 Re: [PATCH] ppc64 utmp changes

Martin v. Loewis

• 2002-10-06 00:15 Re: glibc 2.3 not binary compatible with glibc-2.2.5
• 2002-10-15 22:56 Re: Statically linked binary way way too big
• 2002-10-16 06:06 Re: Statically linked binary way way too big
• 2002-10-17 05:45 Re: Statically linked binary way way too big
• 2002-10-18 11:55 Re: Adding unofficial languages support?
• 2002-10-25 08:55 Re: Making Glibc binaries*smaller*

Mauricio Silveira

• 2002-10-11 22:08 gcc 3.2 needed for everything?

Mike Black

• 2002-10-03 09:11 Re: glibc 2.3
• 2002-10-03 09:26 Re: glibc 2.3

Mike Cleary

• 2002-10-22 07:32 Libc Make Error

Momchil Velikov

• 2002-10-16 00:23 Re: Statically linked binary way way too big
• 2002-10-25 00:48 Re: Csum and csum copyroutines benchmark

Moritz Schulte

• 2002-10-17 02:09 Some Patches for glibc
• 2002-10-17 02:30 libio (was: Re: Some Patches for glibc)
• 2002-10-17 03:10 Re: libio

Nathan Hawkins

• 2002-10-18 07:16 Re: FreeBSD port (61): basic types

Neal H. Walfield

• 2002-10-12 12:26 Re: glibc cvs vs sshd

Paolo Bonzini

• 2002-10-24 00:54 Re: More backref performance - no strncmp
• 2002-10-24 01:33 Re: More backref performance - no strncmp
• 2002-10-24 02:29 More backref performance - no strncmp
• 2002-10-24 03:10 Re: More backref performance - no strncmp
• 2002-10-31 00:45 Re: More backreference performance improvements [take 2]

Paul Eggert

• 2002-10-18 11:25 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-18 13:36 Re: current glibc vs debian sid

Ralf Baechle

• 2002-10-21 07:55 Re: glibc 2.3 on linux-mips

renetta4@thenetanywhere.com

• 2002-10-12 19:56 Heyyy!

Richard Henderson

• 2002-10-04 02:01 Re: glibc-2.3 alpha stxncpy.S
• 2002-10-08 13:57 Re: soft-fp fixes

Roger Sayle

• 2002-10-28 20:47 Re: [i386] memcmp very slow
• 2002-10-31 16:09 [PATCH] Minor tweak to soft-fp/soft-fp.h
• 2002-10-31 18:27 [PATCH] TFmode support for x86 in soft-fp
• 2002-10-31 18:38 [PATCH] Implement __abs?f2 functions in soft-fp
• 2002-10-31 20:34 [PATCH] Fix soft-fp compilation failures with GCC 3.2

Roland McGrath

• 2002-10-01 03:45 Re: [PATCH] ppc64 utmp changes
• 2002-10-01 12:49 Re: [PATCH] glibc 2.2.94 - hppa - min kernel and unwind-find-fde
• 2002-10-01 14:22 Re: [PATCH] glibc 2.2.94 - hppa - fcntl64
• 2002-10-01 18:09 Re: [PATCH] glibc 2.2.94 - hppa - fcntl64
• 2002-10-02 01:45 Re: [PATCH] stat changes for PPC64
• 2002-10-02 01:50 Re: [PATCH] powerpc/bits changes for PPC64
• 2002-10-03 20:30 Re: db1 vs glibc 2.3
• 2002-10-04 12:17 Re: Status of PowerPC64 in glibc-2.3
• 2002-10-05 12:52 Re: glibc 2.3 not binary compatible with glibc-2.2.5
• 2002-10-05 13:59 Re: glibc 2.3 not binary compatible with glibc-2.2.5
• 2002-10-05 14:36 Re: glibc 2.3 not binary compatible with glibc-2.2.5
• 2002-10-05 14:58 Re: glibc 2.3 not binary compatible with glibc-2.2.5
• 2002-10-05 15:42 Re: glibc 2.3 not binary compatible with glibc-2.2.5
• 2002-10-06 01:40 Re: More info on static binary/libnss* mystery
• 2002-10-06 01:42 Re: glibc 2.3 not binary compatible with glibc-2.2.5
• 2002-10-06 16:23 Re: glibc 2.3 on linux-mips
• 2002-10-06 22:49 Re: undefined reference to __ctype_tolower etc in build of glib, gcc,pam + sed-3.58 strangeness + bzip2
• 2002-10-07 00:37 Re: More info on static binary/libnss* mystery
• 2002-10-07 00:51 Re: [PATCH] Complete PPC INLINE_SYSCALL macro
• 2002-10-11 22:23 Re: gcc 3.2 needed for everything?
• 2002-10-14 02:56 Re: stdio.h
• 2002-10-14 19:54 Re: io/test-utime.out
• 2002-10-15 20:04 Re: [PATCH] Make getlogin_r thread safe
• 2002-10-16 01:38 Re: ia64 does not build
• 2002-10-16 08:48 Re: Statically linked binary way way too big
• 2002-10-17 02:04 Re: Statically linked binary way way too big
• 2002-10-17 02:16 Re: glibc cvs failure on ppclinux
• 2002-10-17 03:13 Re: argp
• 2002-10-17 12:33 Re: libio
• 2002-10-17 12:51 Re: libio
• 2002-10-17 17:18 Re: glibc cvs broken?
• 2002-10-17 18:51 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-18 01:13 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-18 02:17 Re: glibc cvs broken?
• 2002-10-18 11:49 Re: [PATCH] configure.in tweaks for autoconf-2.5X
• 2002-10-18 12:20 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-18 12:35 Re: FreeBSD port (60): system calls
• 2002-10-18 13:14 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-18 13:42 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-18 13:51 Re: sysdeps/powerpc/soft-fp unprotected
• 2002-10-18 13:54 Re: Replace obsolete AC_LINK_FILES with AC_CONFIG_LINKS
• 2002-10-18 15:13 Re: FreeBSD port (60): system calls
• 2002-10-18 16:44 Re: ppc completely soft patches
• 2002-10-18 17:06 Re: still building soft-fp on ppclinux
• 2002-10-18 17:16 Re: still building soft-fp on ppclinux
• 2002-10-18 17:18 Re: still building soft-fp on ppclinux
• 2002-10-18 18:02 Re: Treat weak as strong in DSO?
• 2002-10-18 18:04 Re: fpu vs soft-fpu
• 2002-10-18 20:09 FreeBSD port utmp plan
• 2002-10-18 20:20 Re: FreeBSD port (59): new meta files
• 2002-10-19 11:32 Re: still building soft-fp on ppclinux
• 2002-10-19 13:26 Re: still building soft-fp on ppclinux
• 2002-10-21 23:22 Re: problem setlocale in latest glibc and hope locale.alias
• 2002-10-22 08:01 Re: Libc Make Error
• 2002-10-25 16:37 Re: PATCH: Fix errlist for mips
• 2002-10-31 19:52 Re: bug-wfflush.out Error 1

Rose King

• 2002-10-29 20:09 I love you

Sam Halliday

• 2002-10-21 08:07 private symbols
• 2002-10-21 08:11 Re: private symbols

Sam Vilain

• 2002-10-02 17:22 getaddrinfo(NULL, x, {ai_flags=>AI_PASSIVE}, x) answer hardcoded

SANDRA SAVIMBI

• 2002-10-28 05:43 REQUEST FOR AN ASSISTANCE

Saurabh Desai

• 2002-10-09 15:58 Problem compiling glibc-linuxthreads-2.3
• 2002-10-09 16:13 Re: Problem compiling glibc-linuxthreads-2.3
• 2002-10-09 17:16 Re: Problem compiling glibc-linuxthreads-2.3

Sean Roozen

• 2002-10-22 09:22 IMAGINE 50,000 NEW CUSTOMERS

Segher Boessenkool

• 2002-10-01 17:25 Re: [PATCH] ppc32 dl-machine.c

Simon Josefsson

• 2002-10-17 03:04 Re: libio
• 2002-10-17 05:42 Re: libio

sjmunroe

• 2002-10-14 11:32 [PATCH] getlogin_r thread safety

Stefan Jones

• 2002-10-09 04:51 [Patch] glibc-2.3 compile --with-tls using gcc-3.2 unpached
• 2002-10-09 05:00 [Patch] Missing patch in the gcc-3.2 / glibc-2.3 compatablity patch

Stephen L Moshier

• 2002-10-25 06:35 math.h typo

Steve Munroe

• 2002-10-01 07:52 Re: [PATCH] ppc64 utmp changes
• 2002-10-01 15:55 Re: changiing rtld.c
• 2002-10-01 15:59 [PATCH] powerpc/bits changes for PPC64
• 2002-10-01 15:59 [PATCH] stat changes for PPC64
• 2002-10-02 07:59 Re: [PATCH] ppc64 utmp changes
• 2002-10-02 11:46 Re: [PATCH] ppc64 utmp changes
• 2002-10-02 14:25 Re: [PATCH] stat changes for PPC64
• 2002-10-02 15:07 Re: [PATCH] ppc64 changes common powerpc/bits headers
• 2002-10-04 08:13 Status of PowerPC64 in glibc-2.3
• 2002-10-09 14:35 [PATCH] Make getlogin_r thread safe
• 2002-10-10 15:23 Re: problems with 2.3.1pre[12]?

Steven J. Hill

• 2002-10-16 12:06 Re: Statically linked binary way way too big

Steven Munroe

• 2002-10-23 14:58 [PATCH] utmp again

tarrab3@net4u.com

• 2002-10-03 00:53 hey again!

Tobias Hunger

• 2002-10-29 16:34 iconv problem
• 2002-10-30 12:17 Re: iconv problem

Tom Gall

• 2002-10-03 08:57 glibc 2.3 --host powerpc-linux --build i686-linux Build Failure
• 2002-10-03 09:22 Re: glibc 2.3 --host powerpc-linux --build i686-linux Build Failure
• 2002-10-10 15:22 Re: problems with 2.3.1pre[12]?

Ulrich Drepper

• 2002-10-02 14:01 Re: [PATCH] ppc64 utmp changes
• 2002-10-02 16:28 Re: an FAQ
• 2002-10-03 03:09 glibc 2.3
• 2002-10-03 04:45 about RHL8 including glibc-2.2.93
• 2002-10-03 09:02 Re: glibc 2.3 --host powerpc-linux --build i686-linux Build Failure
• 2002-10-03 09:22 Re: glibc 2.3
• 2002-10-03 09:32 Re: glibc 2.3
• 2002-10-03 09:34 Re: glibc 2.3 --host powerpc-linux --build i686-linux Build Failure
• 2002-10-03 14:22 Re: kernel-features.h: Comment typo ?
• 2002-10-03 15:00 Re: Is 2.3 really binary compatible?
• 2002-10-03 20:38 Re: db1 vs glibc 2.3
• 2002-10-03 21:33 Re: home for prelink
• 2002-10-04 01:34 nptl 0.2
• 2002-10-05 01:27 Re: glibc 2.3 not binary compatible with glibc-2.2.5
• 2002-10-05 10:17 Re: glibc 2.3 not binary compatible with glibc-2.2.5
• 2002-10-05 10:52 Re: glibc 2.3 not binary compatible with glibc-2.2.5
• 2002-10-05 13:24 Re: glibc 2.3 not binary compatible with glibc-2.2.5
• 2002-10-07 18:48 nptl 0.3
• 2002-10-08 13:03 Re: glibc cvs broken?
• 2002-10-09 20:29 glibc 2.3.1pre1
• 2002-10-10 03:00 glibc 2.3.1pre2
• 2002-10-10 03:11 nptl 0.4
• 2002-10-10 14:14 problems with 2.3.1pre[12]?
• 2002-10-10 15:31 Re: problems with 2.3.1pre[12]?
• 2002-10-10 23:40 glibc 2.3.1
• 2002-10-11 22:22 Re: gcc 3.2 needed for everything?
• 2002-10-14 11:09 Re: PATCH: Cleanup sunrpc/thrsvc.c
• 2002-10-15 10:44 Re: glibc 2.3
• 2002-10-17 02:21 Re: Some Patches for glibc
• 2002-10-17 10:22 Re: Regex failure
• 2002-10-17 10:35 Re: regex warnings
• 2002-10-17 10:37 Re: charmap-dir warning
• 2002-10-17 12:39 Re: libio
• 2002-10-17 16:17 Re: soft-fp fixes
• 2002-10-17 16:20 Re: ppc completely soft patches
• 2002-10-17 16:48 Re: glibc cvs broken?
• 2002-10-17 17:43 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-17 18:42 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-17 22:01 Re: current glibc vs debian sid
• 2002-10-18 17:51 Re: Treat weak as strong in DSO?
• 2002-10-18 18:47 Re: Treat weak as strong in DSO?
• 2002-10-19 11:39 Re: still building soft-fp on ppclinux
• 2002-10-21 11:19 Re: [PATCH] regex bug fix for gawk
• 2002-10-22 09:37 Re: glibc-2.3.2 release?
• 2002-10-25 01:24 Re: More backreference performance improvements [take 2]

wang rui

• 2002-10-19 02:04 help!! why socket has no respone?
• 2002-10-20 19:30 Re: Re: help!! why socket has no respone?

Wolfram Gloger

• 2002-10-17 01:45 Re: Statically linked binary way way too big
• 2002-10-17 02:35 Re: Statically linked binary way way too big
• 2002-10-30 01:52 Re: Linux getdents.c is not aliasing safe
• 2002-10-30 03:46 Re: Linux getdents.c is not aliasing safe

Yaroslav Popovitch

• 2002-10-05 11:13 Problems with compiling glibc-2.3
• 2002-10-10 07:09 binutils 2.13.90.0.4 and gcc-3.2: library conflict

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)