This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Small fix for Linux __opensock

From: Wolfram Gloger <Wolfram dot Gloger at dent dot med dot uni-muenchen dot de>
To: drepper at redhat dot com
Cc: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 15:21:55 +0100 ("MET)
Subject: Re: Small fix for Linux __opensock
References: <200202142359.AAA52317@max.zk-i.med.uni-muenchen.de> <m3it8zoadi.fsf@myware.mynet>

> There is a good reason for the current order but I cannot remember
> right now.  I'll have to think more about it.

It's certainly possible that the current order in __opensock has other
advantages.  Let me know and I will try to come up with a more
specific workaround for if_nameindex(), since I doubt that we can get
unix_ioctl() in Linux-2.2 and earlier changed.

Regards,
Wolfram.

References:
- Small fix for Linux __opensock
  - From: Wolfram Gloger
- Re: Small fix for Linux __opensock
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]