This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [ekato@ees.hokudai.ac.jp] libc/2271: sln core dumps: bugs of libc-start.c on powerpc?
- To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: [ekato@ees.hokudai.ac.jp] libc/2271: sln core dumps: bugs of libc-start.c on powerpc?
- From: Etsushi Kato <ekato at ees dot hokudai dot ac dot jp>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 14:41:39 +0900
- Cc: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <u81ypn5h8u.fsf@gromit.moeb> <m3u22dc6kv.fsf@otr.mynet>
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 04:22:24PM -0700,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Looking at the generic version of libc-start, the appended patch looks
> > fine.
>
> This patch shouldn't be necessary. Why was it applied? If the use of
> atexit breaks something it a problem with the tools.
So why you use __cxa_atexit on sysdeps/generic/libc-start.c?
According to CVS log...
---
CVSROOT: /cvs/glibc
Module name: libc
Changes by: drepper@sources.redhat.com 2001-02-26 09:50:57
Modified files:
sysdeps/generic: bb_init_func.c libc-start.c
Log message:
Use __cxa_atexit and not atexit.
---
Why only powerpc specific libc-start.c have to use atexit not
__cxa_atexit?
I'm not a developper and don't know how glibc and new gcc-3.0 are
related. But it just a question.
Regard,
--
Etsushi Kato
ekato@ees.hokudai.ac.jp