This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: A patch for dl-profile

To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at cygnus dot com>
Subject: Re: A patch for dl-profile
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 00:28:04 -0700
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
References: <20010516212907.A13839@lucon.org> <m3ae4co4ap.fsf@otr.mynet> <20010517000928.A16213@lucon.org> <m3lmnwmo6r.fsf@otr.mynet>

On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 12:26:04AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:
> 
> > The reason is the profile data file is BAD for some reason. But ld.so
> > shouldn't segfault like that.
> 
> That's the reason for ld.so getting into trouble.  What is the actual
> code in ld.so which is having problems and why you want to bail out
> that early?  The intention definitely is to continue running the
> application but without profiling.
> 

When I find time, I will look into it more.


H.J.

References:
- A patch for dl-profile
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: A patch for dl-profile
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: A patch for dl-profile
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: A patch for dl-profile
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]