This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: A patch for dl-profile

To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Subject: Re: A patch for dl-profile
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Date: 17 May 2001 00:26:04 -0700
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
References: <20010516212907.A13839@lucon.org> <m3ae4co4ap.fsf@otr.mynet><20010517000928.A16213@lucon.org>
Reply-To: drepper at cygnus dot com (Ulrich Drepper)

"H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:

> The reason is the profile data file is BAD for some reason. But ld.so
> shouldn't segfault like that.

That's the reason for ld.so getting into trouble.  What is the actual
code in ld.so which is having problems and why you want to bail out
that early?  The intention definitely is to continue running the
application but without profiling.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A patch for dl-profile
  - From: H . J . Lu
- PATCH: Re: A patch for dl-profile
  - From: H . J . Lu

References:
- A patch for dl-profile
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: A patch for dl-profile
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: A patch for dl-profile
  - From: H . J . Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]