This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [skimo@kotnet.org] libc/2030: [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]


Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:

|> Hi,
|> 
|> we received the following bug report about problems with binutils.
|> 
|> Should we demand newer binutils?  Is this really a bug - and how can
|> we check for recent enough binutils?
|> 
|> Will the following work for configure?  And is a test for 2.10.1 or
|> newer sufficient?

That would be wrong for ia64, where the latest version is 2.9-ia64-000717.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab                                  "And now for something
SuSE Labs                                        completely different."
Andreas.Schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]