This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [skimo@kotnet.org] libc/2030: [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]
- To: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- Subject: Re: [skimo@kotnet.org] libc/2030: [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- Date: 20 Jan 2001 17:15:57 +0100
- References: <u83dee9xkk.fsf@gromit.rhein-neckar.de>
Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:
|> Hi,
|>
|> we received the following bug report about problems with binutils.
|>
|> Should we demand newer binutils? Is this really a bug - and how can
|> we check for recent enough binutils?
|>
|> Will the following work for configure? And is a test for 2.10.1 or
|> newer sufficient?
That would be wrong for ia64, where the latest version is 2.9-ia64-000717.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab "And now for something
SuSE Labs completely different."
Andreas.Schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg