This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [rfc] no more than 1020 threads total in a processes lifetime?

To: Ben Collins <bcollins at debian dot org>
Subject: Re: [rfc] no more than 1020 threads total in a processes lifetime?
From: Momchil Velikov <velco at fadata dot bg>
Date: 24 Dec 2000 19:44:35 +0200
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
References: <20001224112009.Q18814@visi.net> <m34rztbwp6.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com> <20001224114833.T18814@visi.net> <m3wvcpagba.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com> <20001224122341.W18814@visi.net>

>>>>> "Ben" == Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org> writes:
Ben> Well, since you've taken the time to declare the FAQ to be incorrect,
Ben> and the test case to be incorrect aswell, could you at the very least
Ben> point out how it is incorrect?

no pthread_detach()

Regards,
-velco

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [rfc] no more than 1020 threads total in a processes lifetime?
  - From: Ben Collins

References:
- [rfc] no more than 1020 threads total in a processes lifetime?
  - From: Ben Collins
- Re: [rfc] no more than 1020 threads total in a processes lifetime?
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: [rfc] no more than 1020 threads total in a processes lifetime?
  - From: Ben Collins
- Re: [rfc] no more than 1020 threads total in a processes lifetime?
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: [rfc] no more than 1020 threads total in a processes lifetime?
  - From: Ben Collins

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]