This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: (3)Test report glibc-2.1.90(Re: (2)Test report glibc-2.1.90
Kaoru Fukui <email@example.com> writes:
|> From: Andreas Jaeger <firstname.lastname@example.org>
|> > The problem is that the broken make creates a wrong order for one list
|> > in that file. The list has to be recreated with the new make - which
|> > happens if you remove the file.
|> I unstoot this problem,I have a clear.
|> I have found the other problem. The sln gave me SegFault.
|> it's used gcc-2.95.2 and gcc-2.96.
|> Both recompiled glibc put Segfault when installing.
|> Look at the result and backtrace.
Have you tried updating binutils?
Andreas Schwab "And now for something
SuSE Labs completely different."
SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg