guile archive
date index for February, 2000

This is the mail archive of the guile@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the Guile project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

February 29, 2000
21:02 Re: values (Re: R5RS) Jim Blandy
17:02 Goops and the module system Eric Moore
14:55 Re: Question: resume after error or break? Telford Tendys
10:23 Re: Goops and the module system Michael Livshin
10:02 Re: Goops and the module system Miroslav Silovic
09:47 Re: cvsignore Marius Vollmer
09:43 Goops and the module system Jost Boekemeier
07:26 kill, again Russell McManus
07:24 return value from kill in posix.c desired Russell McManus
06:00 Re: values (Re: R5RS) C. Ray C.
05:52 Re: goops/guile doc (was Re: Simple example program to illustrate Goops) Gary Houston
04:46 Re: values (Re: R5RS) Christian Lynbech
04:06 Re: values (Re: R5RS) C. Ray C.
03:16 Question: resume after error or break? Nicolas Neuss

February 28, 2000
20:13 Re: Unexec gurus? Telford Tendys
16:22 Re: R5RS Keith Wright
16:21 Re: A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts Keith Wright
12:57 Re: cvsignore Jim Blandy
12:52 Re: values (Re: R5RS) Jim Blandy
08:48 Re: goops/guile doc (was Re: Simple example program to illustrate Goops) Jim Blandy
00:11 Re: values (Re: R5RS) C. Ray C.

February 27, 2000
20:56 Re: values (Re: R5RS) Jorgen `forcer' Schaefer
20:27 Re: values (Re: R5RS) Jim Blandy
18:50 Re: Why does the GC frees my function? Greg Harvey
18:31 Re: Unexec gurus? Jim Blandy
16:19 Re: values (Re: R5RS) Jorgen `forcer' Schaefer
12:48 Re: Unexec gurus? Christian Lynbech
09:38 values (Re: R5RS) Michael Livshin
09:29 Re: R5RS Jorgen `forcer' Schaefer
04:39 Re: R5RS Moshe Zadka
04:27 Re: R5RS C. Ray C.

February 26, 2000
14:20 Re: Unexec gurus? Jim Blandy
09:27 Re: Why does the GC frees my function? Dimitri Ara
09:13 R5RS Moshe Zadka
09:10 Re: Why does the GC frees my function? Miroslav Silovic

February 25, 2000
12:08 Re: Where should I install compiled modules please? Marius Vollmer
11:51 Re: Why does the GC frees my function? Dimitri Ara
11:33 Re: A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts Jost Boekemeier
10:56 Re: A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts Marius Vollmer
10:40 Re: A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts Per Bothner
07:28 Re: A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts Jost Boekemeier
04:08 Re: A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts Mikael Djurfeldt
03:10 Re: Why does the GC frees my function? Miroslav Silovic
02:49 Re: A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts Jost Boekemeier
02:37 Re: A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts Jost Boekemeier
02:13 Re: A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts Mikael Djurfeldt
02:12 Re: A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts Jost Boekemeier
01:49 Re: A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts Jost Boekemeier
01:43 Re: A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts Jost Boekemeier
01:39 Re: A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts Jost Boekemeier
01:18 strange behavior with guile -s C. Ray C.
00:01 Re: A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts Neil Jerram

February 24, 2000
23:26 Re: A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts Christian Lynbech
19:31 Re: Announcing Greg-1.0 - a Guile-based DejaGNU replacement Jim Blandy
16:23 Re: A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts Jim Blandy
13:55 Re: Why does the GC frees my function? Dimitri Ara
13:51 Re: A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts Mikael Djurfeldt
13:35 Re: A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts Marius Vollmer
13:23 Re: A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts Mikael Djurfeldt
13:08 Re: A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts Michael Livshin
11:23 A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts Mikael Djurfeldt
01:28 Re: Why does the GC frees my function? Miroslav Silovic

February 23, 2000
15:35 Why does the GC frees my function? Dimitri Ara
15:01 Re: Where should I install compiled modules please? Dirk Herrmann
13:30 Re: Announcing Greg-1.0 - a Guile-based DejaGNU replacement Lalo Martins
12:15 Re: Where should I install compiled modules please? thi
12:03 Re: Where should I install compiled modules please? thi
11:51 Re: Where should I install compiled modules please? Marius Vollmer
09:09 Re: Where should I install compiled modules please? Dirk Herrmann
08:17 Re: About modules Klaus Schilling
08:15 Re: Where should I install compiled modules please? Ian Grant
07:54 Re: About modules Jost Boekemeier
07:44 Re: Announcing Greg-1.0 - a Guile-based DejaGNU replacement Greg J. Badros
07:18 Re: About modules Klaus Schilling
07:08 Re: XML and DOM Thierry Bezecourt
06:21 XML and DOM Olivier Buechel
04:39 Re: About modules Jost Boekemeier
04:28 Where should I install compiled modules please? richard
04:17 Re: About modules Jost Boekemeier
04:05 Re: About modules Klaus Schilling
04:03 Re: About modules Klaus Schilling
03:13 Re: About modules Jost Boekemeier
02:53 Re: About modules Mikael Djurfeldt
01:55 Re: About modules Michael Livshin

February 22, 2000
22:42 Announcing Greg-1.0 - a Guile-based DejaGNU replacement richard
13:47 Re: About modules Marius Vollmer
11:45 About modules Marius Vollmer
00:51 Re: GC and continuations Janis Dzerins
00:15 Re: SRFI-17 Keith Wright
00:15 Re: SRFI-17 Keith Wright
00:15 Re: SRFI-17 Keith Wright
00:09 Re: SRFI-17 Jost Boekemeier
00:05 Re: SRFI-17 Christian Lynbech

February 21, 2000
15:03 Re: Loadable scheme object code Marius Vollmer
11:33 Re: SRFI-17 Marius Vollmer
09:13 Re: GC and continuations Jim Blandy
09:06 typedef void * SCM Han-Wen Nienhuys
08:54 Re: typedef void * SCM Jim Blandy
05:37 Re: GC and continuations Michael Livshin
00:44 Re: New module system wishlist Jost Boekemeier
00:32 Re: Translators/source language detection Jost Boekemeier

February 20, 2000
22:43 Re: binary-io, opposable-thumb, pack/unpack (was Re: binary-io (was Re: rfc 2045 base64 encoding/decoding module)) Per Bothner
22:01 Re: binary-io, opposable-thumb, pack/unpack (was Re: binary-io (was Re: rfc 2045 base64 encoding/decoding module)) Telford Tendys
21:36 Re: GC and continuations Telford Tendys
21:36 Re: typedef void * SCM Telford Tendys
18:23 Re: Translators/source language detection Jorgen `forcer' Schaefer
17:07 Re: Translators/source language detection Jim Blandy
17:06 Loadable scheme object code Keisuke Nishida
10:17 Re: binary-io, opposable-thumb, pack/unpack (was Re: binary-io (was Re: rfc 2045 base64 encoding/decoding module)) Gary Houston
07:30 Re: New module system wishlist Michael Livshin
07:19 Re: New module system wishlist Lalo Martins

February 19, 2000
23:41 Re: typedef void * SCM Ken Raeburn
12:18 Re: void * patch, updated Greg J. Badros
05:21 void * patch, updated Han-Wen Nienhuys

February 18, 2000
21:59 Re: module question Greg J. Badros
21:05 module question Eric Moore
12:30 Re: Translators again Jost Boekemeier
02:35 Re: typedef void * SCM Dirk Herrmann
02:04 Re: typedef void * SCM Han-Wen Nienhuys
01:54 Re: typedef void * SCM Han-Wen Nienhuys
01:16 Re: typedef void * SCM Thierry Bezecourt
00:41 Re: typedef void * SCM Dirk Herrmann

February 17, 2000
22:32 Re: binary-io, opposable-thumb, pack/unpack (was Re: binary-io (was Re: rfc 2045 base64 encoding/decoding module)) Per Bothner
20:46 Re: Translators again Ian Bicking
19:00 Re: GC and continuations C. Ray C.
15:14 Re: typedef void * SCM Han-Wen Nienhuys
15:12 Re: typedef void * SCM Han-Wen Nienhuys
14:01 Re: binary-io, opposable-thumb, pack/unpack (was Re: binary-io (was Re: rfc 2045 base64 encoding/decoding module)) Gary Houston
13:23 Re: Translators again Lalo Martins
12:27 Re: GC and continuations Greg Harvey
12:12 Re: Translators again Jost Boekemeier
10:58 Re: typedef void * SCM Eric Moore
10:51 Re: typedef void * SCM Greg J. Badros
10:34 Re: Translators again Ian Bicking
10:23 Re: typedef void * SCM Dirk Herrmann
09:35 typedef void * SCM Han-Wen Nienhuys
09:07 Re: GC and continuations Jost Boekemeier
07:59 Re: GC and continuations Michael Livshin
07:49 Re: GC and continuations Janis Dzerins
07:18 Re: GC and continuations Ole Myren Rohne
04:51 GC and continuations Janis Dzerins
02:00 Re: binary-io, opposable-thumb, pack/unpack (was Re: binary-io(was Re: rfc 2045 base64 encoding/decoding module)) sen_ml

February 16, 2000
18:12 Re: binary-io, opposable-thumb, pack/unpack (was Re: binary-io (was Re: rfc 2045 base64 encoding/decoding module)) Per Bothner
16:20 Re: binary-io, opposable-thumb, pack/unpack (was Re: binary-io (was Re: rfc 2045 base64 encoding/decoding module)) Gary Houston
14:04 Re: binary-io, opposable-thumb, pack/unpack (was Re: binary-io (was Re: rfc 2045 base64 encoding/decoding module)) Per Bothner
13:27 Re: binary-io, opposable-thumb, pack/unpack (was Re: binary-io (was Re: rfc 2045 base64 encoding/decoding module)) Gary Houston
10:41 Re: Translators again Jost Boekemeier
04:32 Rational numbers with GOOPS Nicolas Neuss

February 15, 2000
16:10 Re: Translators again Ian Bicking
14:01 Re: SWIG and guile Clark McGrew
13:31 Re: more module system wishlist blathering Miroslav Silovic
12:29 debugging evaluator in embedded program? Russell McManus
11:59 Re: SWIG and guile thi
10:55 Re: binary-io, opposable-thumb, pack/unpack (was Re: binary-io (was Re: rfc 2045 base64 encoding/decoding module)) Per Bothner
04:30 Re: more module system wishlist blathering Jost Boekemeier
04:03 Re: more module system wishlist blathering Michael Livshin
03:54 Re: more module system wishlist blathering Jost Boekemeier
03:04 Small patch Daniel Skarda
02:52 [ANN] guile & i18n: guile-gettext Daniel Skarda
02:37 Re: more module system wishlist blathering Michael Livshin
00:34 Re: Translators again Jost Boekemeier
00:19 Re: How does the debugger work ? Jost Boekemeier
00:17 Re: New module system wishlist Jost Boekemeier

February 14, 2000
23:41 Re: more module system wishlist blathering Jost Boekemeier
17:19 binary-io, opposable-thumb, pack/unpack (was Re: binary-io (wasRe: rfc 2045 base64 encoding/decoding module)) sen_ml
13:55 Re: binary-io (was Re: rfc 2045 base64 encoding/decoding module) Clark McGrew
13:54 Re: binary-io (was Re: rfc 2045 base64 encoding/decoding module) Gary Houston
00:18 Re: How does the debugger work ? Mikael Djurfeldt

February 13, 2000
15:54 Re: How does the debugger work ? Thierry Bezecourt
14:37 Re: Translators again Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
13:50 Re: How does the debugger work ? Mikael Djurfeldt
13:50 Re: Translators again Ian Bicking
10:57 more module system wishlist blathering Michael Livshin
08:52 Re: [linux@rkirkpat.net: Bug#57879: Recompile of geda-gschem required after libguile6 update.] Craig Brozefsky

February 12, 2000
16:05 Re: binary-io (was Re: rfc 2045 base64 encoding/decoding module) C. Ray C.
16:05 Re: binary-io (was Re: rfc 2045 base64 encoding/decoding module) C. Ray C.
15:09 Re: binary-io (was Re: rfc 2045 base64 encoding/decoding module) Eric Moore
13:41 Re: Translators again Ian Bicking
11:02 Re: binary-io (was Re: rfc 2045 base64 encoding/decoding module) Gary Houston
05:47 How does the debugger work ? Thierry Bezecourt
05:25 Re: binary-io (was Re: rfc 2045 base64 encoding/decoding module) Gary Houston

February 11, 2000
19:40 Re: New module system wishlist Lalo Martins
13:05 Re: SRFI-17 Per Bothner
04:36 Bignum logxxx patch Dale P. Smith
04:07 Re: GOOPS and class linearization Michael Livshin
02:31 Re: on the topic of GC. Miroslav Silovic
01:48 Re: What type are internet addresses? Nicolas Neuss
01:46 Re: What type are internet addresses? Thierry Bezecourt
01:46 Re: What type are internet addresses? Thierry Bezecourt
01:14 Re: logxxx and bignums Dirk Herrmann
01:03 Re: binary-io (was Re: rfc 2045 base64 encoding/decoding module) Ole Myren Rohne

February 10, 2000
23:59 Re: What type are internet addresses? C. Ray C.
22:20 Re: SRFI-17 Keith Wright
22:09 What type are internet addresses? Rodney Polkinghorne
16:48 Re: logxxx and bignums Mikael Djurfeldt
16:44 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Jost Boekemeier
16:36 Re: binary-io (was Re: rfc 2045 base64 encoding/decoding module) C. Ray C.
16:13 Re: logxxx and bignums Greg J. Badros
16:00 Re: logxxx and bignums Dale P. Smith
15:57 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Mikael Djurfeldt
15:52 Re: binary-io (was Re: rfc 2045 base64 encoding/decoding module) Gary Houston
15:40 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Neil Jerram
15:40 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Neil Jerram
15:40 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Neil Jerram
12:27 Re: GOOPS and class linearization Jost Boekemeier
11:07 Re: a minor random nit Mikael Djurfeldt
11:04 Re: a minor random nit Mikael Djurfeldt
09:55 Re: on the topic of GC. Dirk Herrmann
09:51 Re: a minor random nit Greg J. Badros
09:22 Re: Evaluator code question Jost Boekemeier
09:11 Re: on the topic of GC. Michael Livshin
09:06 Re: Question to ilisp/guile Michael Livshin
08:53 Re: a minor random nit Mikael Djurfeldt
07:02 a minor random nit Bill Schottstaedt

February 09, 2000
16:43 Re: Translators again Ian Bicking
14:58 Evaluator code question Neil Jerram
14:48 Re: on the topic of GC. Mikael Djurfeldt
13:50 Re: GOOPS and class linearization Mikael Djurfeldt
13:21 Re: on the topic of GC. Clark McGrew
11:24 Re: Question to ilisp/guile Valentin Kamyshenko
10:55 Question to ilisp/guile Nicolas Neuss
10:03 Re: GOOPS and class linearization Greg J. Badros
09:14 Re: Translators again Jost Boekemeier
09:11 GOOPS and class linearization Michael Livshin
08:50 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Jost Boekemeier
06:36 Re: on the topic of GC. Michael Livshin

February 08, 2000
18:01 Re: HTTP 1.1 server Lalo Martins
16:59 Re: Translators again Ian Bicking
15:54 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Eric Moore
15:33 HTTP 1.1 server C. Ray C.
15:02 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Jost Boekemeier
14:43 Re: inet-ntoa and inet-aton byte order question? Gary Houston
14:40 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Eric Moore
11:07 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Jost Boekemeier
05:14 inet-ntoa and inet-aton byte order question? Janis Dzerins
01:49 Re: GOOPS plans regarding previous email of mine Klaus Schilling
00:06 Re: is there a gc hook? Christian Lynbech

February 07, 2000
13:33 Re: GOOPS plans Marius Vollmer
13:33 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Marius Vollmer
13:08 Re: New module system wishlist Jost Boekemeier
10:40 Re: Translators again Jost Boekemeier
10:25 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Jost Boekemeier
03:43 Re: need SETQ Ivan Toshkov

February 06, 2000
22:47 Re: SWIG and guile Rob Browning
20:17 Re: Translators again Lalo Martins
19:16 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Eric Moore
15:30 Re: GOOPS plans Mikael Djurfeldt
14:55 Re: need SETQ PILCH Hartmut
14:52 Re: need SETQ PILCH Hartmut
14:42 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Marius Vollmer
14:23 Re: GOOPS plans Marius Vollmer
13:25 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Mikael Djurfeldt
12:12 Re: GOOPS plans Mikael Djurfeldt
11:34 Re: GOOPS plans regarding previous email of mine Craig Brozefsky
10:55 Re: GOOPS plans Craig Brozefsky
10:38 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Mikael Djurfeldt
10:22 GOOPS plans Mikael Djurfeldt
09:50 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Michael Livshin
08:59 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Marius Vollmer
08:09 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Michael Livshin
07:20 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Marius Vollmer
02:27 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Neil Jerram

February 05, 2000
12:22 Re: Dumping and restoring side-effects Greg J. Badros
04:04 Re: Dumping and restoring side-effects Neil Jerram

February 04, 2000
15:55 Re: need SETQ Michael Vanier
10:15 Re: Dumping and restoring side-effects Greg J. Badros
10:09 Re: Dumping and restoring side-effects Dirk Herrmann
09:40 Re: Dumping and restoring side-effects Greg J. Badros
09:33 Re: Dumping and restoring side-effects Dirk Herrmann
09:22 Re: need SETQ Dirk Herrmann
09:21 Re: need SETQ Ivan Toshkov
09:11 Re: Dumping and restoring side-effects Greg J. Badros
08:55 need SETQ PILCH Hartmut
02:51 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Thierry Bezecourt

February 03, 2000
19:29 Re: Problems understanding test-suite Greg Harvey
19:22 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Mikael Djurfeldt
19:05 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Mikael Djurfeldt
19:03 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Mikael Djurfeldt
17:54 Re: Dumping and restoring side-effects Neil Jerram
17:47 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Neil Jerram
17:47 Re: Translators again Neil Jerram
17:47 Re: Dumping and restoring side-effects Neil Jerram
17:46 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Neil Jerram
17:46 Re: Dumping and restoring side-effects Neil Jerram
15:51 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Jost Boekemeier
15:21 Re: dynamic linking fails (solved) C. Ray C.
14:50 Re: dynamic linking fails C. Ray C.
13:44 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Ken Anderson
13:14 dynamic linking fails C. Ray C.
11:52 Re: Dumping and restoring side-effects Greg J. Badros
11:46 Re: Dumping and restoring side-effects Greg J. Badros
07:10 Re: Dumping and restoring side-effects Miroslav Silovic
05:47 Re: Dumping and restoring side-effects Russell McManus
04:56 Re: Dumping and restoring side-effects Greg Troxel
03:59 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Michael Livshin
02:34 Re: stack overflow with hobbit Bernard URBAN
00:58 Re: engineering an opposable thumb for guile? Ken Raeburn

February 02, 2000
22:53 binary-io (was Re: rfc 2045 base64 encoding/decoding module) sen_ml
18:51 Re: goops/guile doc (was Re: Simple example program to illustrate Goops) Lalo Martins
17:06 Re: goops/guile doc (was Re: Simple example program to illustrate Goops) Greg Harvey
13:22 Re: base64.scm version 0.1 Harvey J. Stein
13:08 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Marius Vollmer
13:07 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Marius Vollmer
11:30 Dumping and restoring side-effects Greg J. Badros
07:59 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Jost Boekemeier
07:55 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Jost Boekemeier
04:44 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Jost Boekemeier
04:35 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Jost Boekemeier
03:45 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Jost Boekemeier
03:34 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Mikael Djurfeldt
03:34 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Jost Boekemeier
03:05 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Jost Boekemeier
01:47 Re: question about r5rs (was Re: pack/unpack) Nicolas Neuss
01:40 Re: base64.scm version 0.1 sen_ml

February 01, 2000
23:57 Re: question about r5rs (was Re: pack/unpack) sen_ml
23:36 Re: question about r5rs (was Re: pack/unpack) Lars Arvestad
14:29 Re: question about r5rs (was Re: pack/unpack) David Lutterkort
13:33 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Mikael Djurfeldt
12:42 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Marius Vollmer
08:02 Re: base64.scm version 0.1 Harvey J. Stein
08:01 [Matthias Felleisen <matthias@cs.rice.edu>] Scheme and Functional Programming 2000 Jim Blandy
07:29 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Michael Livshin
06:47 Unnecessary code in boot-9.scm Dirk Herrmann
05:40 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Michael Livshin
05:28 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Jost Boekemeier
05:03 Re: Trouble understanding define (!) Michael Livshin


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.4.5