This is the mail archive of the
gsl-discuss@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GSL project.
Re: simplicity vs. efficiency of algorithms in GSL
- From: Gerard Jungman <jungman at lanl dot gov>
- To: GSL Discuss Mailing List <gsl-discuss at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:04:09 -0600
- Subject: Re: simplicity vs. efficiency of algorithms in GSL
- References: <200809221621.54890.emanuele.passera@treuropa.com> <20080922162507.GA29877@hippogriff.homeunix.org> <48D7E476.2010000@iki.fi> <20080922195029.GA9060@hippogriff.homeunix.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0809221659420.4000@lilith.rgb.private.net> <1222206451.30638.62.camel@bellerophon.lanl.gov> <m3hc85xn1t.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk> <1222301240.30638.146.camel@bellerophon.lanl.gov> <m3skrm4m4p.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk> <9ACA4123-675A-43C1-9200-F0AABB076117@googlemail.com> <1223413980.14338.96.camel@bellerophon.lanl.gov> <48EE4F5F.7000707@iki.fi>
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 21:37 +0300, Tuomo Keskitalo wrote:
> I, too, would very much like to see a good interface for linear algebra!
It may be too soon to have a party, but I'm excited about the
following, which was just brought to my attention. The ten-year
wait may soon be over.
http://icl.cs.utk.edu/~delmas/lapwrapc.html
It's a draft standard for a C LAPACK interface.
Apparently the LAPACK group is working with Intel to create a final
version of the standard. It may be done early next year. Perhaps it's
time to start thinking seriously about this.
--
G. Jungman