This is the mail archive of the gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GSL project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GSL_Wigner_6J error

From: Brian Gough <bjg at network-theory dot co dot uk>
To: Gerard Jungman <jungman at lanl dot gov>
Cc: gsl-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 11:57:06 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Re: GSL_Wigner_6J error
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0211181805480.3563-100000@hoover.amtp.cam.ac.uk><1037821394.1299.59.camel@bellerophon.lanl.gov>

Gerard Jungman writes:
 > 
 > Hi all. Sorry for the confusion here. I implemented this code,
 > but I never looked closely at it. Is there a consensus about
 > how it should work? It is definitely true that, as implemented,
 > the function returns
 > 
 > / Ja Jb Je \
 > \ Jd Jc Jf /
 > 
 > I'm not sure where this convention comes from, if anywhere.
 > 
 > Should I change the interface or just change the documentation?

We should use the most definitive version of 6j and 9j.  Here
is my suggestion:

http://wwwinfo.cern.ch/asdoc/psdir/shortwrups.dir/u111.ps.gz

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GSL_Wigner_6J error
  - From: Gerard Jungman

References:
- Re: GSL_Wigner_6J error
  - From: Peter Roche
- Re: GSL_Wigner_6J error
  - From: Gerard Jungman

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]