This is the mail archive of the glibc-cvs@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

GNU C Library master sources branch release/2.28/master updated. glibc-2.28-16-ga55e109


This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU C Library master sources".

The branch, release/2.28/master has been updated
       via  a55e109709af55e6ed67d3f9536cac5d929c982e (commit)
      from  307d04334d516bb180f484a2b283f97310bfee66 (commit)

Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.

- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
http://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=a55e109709af55e6ed67d3f9536cac5d929c982e

commit a55e109709af55e6ed67d3f9536cac5d929c982e
Author: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Sep 5 01:16:42 2018 -0400

    Fix tst-setcontext9 for optimized small stacks.
    
    If the compiler reduces the stack usage in function f1 before calling
    into function f2, then when we swapcontext back to f1 and continue
    execution we may overwrite registers that were spilled to the stack
    while f2 was executing.  Later when we return to f2 the corrupt
    registers will be reloaded from the stack and the test will crash.  This
    was most commonly observed on i686 with __x86.get_pc_thunk.dx and
    needing to save and restore $edx.  Overall i686 has few registers and
    the spilling to the stack is bound to happen, therefore the solution to
    making this test robust is to split function f1 into two parts f1a and
    f1b, and allocate f1b it's own stack such that subsequent execution does
    not overwrite the stack in use by function f2.
    
    Tested on i686 and x86_64.
    
    Signed-off-by: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
    (cherry picked from commit 791b350dc725545e3f9b5db0f97ebdbc60c9735f)

diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index b380048..bda9634 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2018-09-19  Carlos O'Donell  <carlos@redhat.com>
+
+	* stdlib/tst-setcontext9.c (f1): Rename to...
+	(f1a): ... this.
+	(f1b): New function implementing lower half of f1 in alternate stack.
+
 2018-09-20  Florian Weimer  <fweimer@redhat.com>
 
 	* misc/tst-gethostid.c: New file.
diff --git a/stdlib/tst-setcontext9.c b/stdlib/tst-setcontext9.c
index 4636ce9..db83557 100644
--- a/stdlib/tst-setcontext9.c
+++ b/stdlib/tst-setcontext9.c
@@ -41,26 +41,55 @@ f2 (void)
 }
 
 static void
-f1 (void)
+f1b (void)
 {
-  puts ("start f1");
-  if (getcontext (&ctx[2]) != 0)
-    {
-      printf ("%s: getcontext: %m\n", __FUNCTION__);
-      exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
-    }
   if (done)
     {
-      puts ("set context in f1");
+      puts ("set context in f1b");
       if (setcontext (&ctx[3]) != 0)
 	{
 	  printf ("%s: setcontext: %m\n", __FUNCTION__);
 	  exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
 	}
     }
+  exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
+}
+
+static void
+f1a (void)
+{
+  char st2[32768];
+  puts ("start f1a");
+  if (getcontext (&ctx[2]) != 0)
+    {
+      printf ("%s: getcontext: %m\n", __FUNCTION__);
+      exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
+    }
+  ctx[2].uc_stack.ss_sp = st2;
+  ctx[2].uc_stack.ss_size = sizeof st2;
+  ctx[2].uc_link = &ctx[0];
+  makecontext (&ctx[2], (void (*) (void)) f1b, 0);
   f2 ();
 }
 
+/* The execution path through the test looks like this:
+   do_test (call)
+   -> "making contexts"
+   -> "swap contexts"
+   f1a (via swapcontext to ctx[1], with alternate stack)
+   -> "start f1a"
+   f2 (call)
+   -> "swap contexts in f2"
+   f1b (via swapcontext to ctx[2], with alternate stack)
+   -> "set context in f1b"
+   do_test (via setcontext to ctx[3], main stack)
+   -> "setcontext"
+   f2 (via setcontext to ctx[4], with alternate stack)
+   -> "end f2"
+
+   We must use an alternate stack for f1b, because if we don't then the
+   result of executing an earlier caller may overwrite registers
+   spilled to the stack in f2.  */
 static int
 do_test (void)
 {
@@ -79,7 +108,7 @@ do_test (void)
   ctx[1].uc_stack.ss_sp = st1;
   ctx[1].uc_stack.ss_size = sizeof st1;
   ctx[1].uc_link = &ctx[0];
-  makecontext (&ctx[1], (void (*) (void)) f1, 0);
+  makecontext (&ctx[1], (void (*) (void)) f1a, 0);
   puts ("swap contexts");
   if (swapcontext (&ctx[3], &ctx[1]) != 0)
     {

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of changes:
 ChangeLog                |    6 +++++
 stdlib/tst-setcontext9.c |   47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)


hooks/post-receive
-- 
GNU C Library master sources


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]