[Bug libc/15648] multiple definition of `__lll_lock_wait_private'

["knrstaj at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15648

--- Comment #8 from Neil <knrstaj at gmail dot com> ---
Yes, I see the libc.a and libpthread.a

nm /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libpthread.a
lowlevellock.o:
         U __have_futex_clock_realtime
00000030 T __lll_lock_wait
00000000 T __lll_lock_wait_private
00000060 T __lll_timedlock_wait
000001c0 T __lll_timedwait_tid
00000190 T __lll_unlock_wake
00000160 T __lll_unlock_wake_private
         U _dl_sysinfo

nm /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.a
libc-lowlevellock.o:
00000000 T __lll_lock_wait_private
00000030 T __lll_unlock_wake_private
         U _dl_sysinfo

Why not to make __lll_lock_wait_private and __lll_unlock_wake_private in a
individual file?

If ld include libc-lowlevellock.o first, it always cause error when includeing
lowlevellock.o. Right?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.