This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug libc/10320] erand48 implementation not thread safe but POSIX says it should be
- From: "bugdal at aerifal dot cx" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 22:52:25 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libc/10320] erand48 implementation not thread safe but POSIX says it should be
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-10320-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10320
Rich Felker <bugdal at aerifal dot cx> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bugdal at aerifal dot cx
--- Comment #5 from Rich Felker <bugdal at aerifal dot cx> 2012-12-20 22:52:25 UTC ---
Can you clarify whether there is actually a bug here? POSIX says:
The drand48(), lrand48(), and mrand48() functions need not be thread-safe.
If you're claiming erand48, jrand48, and/or nrand48 also have thread-safety
problems, please clarify that and explain what the problem is.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.