This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug nptl/11799] si_code is not SI_USER on raise()
- From: "mtk.manpages at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 01:18:23 +0000
- Subject: [Bug nptl/11799] si_code is not SI_USER on raise()
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-11799-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11799
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mtk.manpages at gmail dot
| |com
--- Comment #3 from Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages at gmail dot com> 2012-04-20 01:18:23 UTC ---
Around glibc 2.3.2/2.3.3, the implementation of raise() changed, resulting in a
silent ABI change to the si_code behavior. Once upon a time, the code comment
was true.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.