This is the mail archive of the glibc-bugs@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug localedata/10501] bn_IN collation does not have canonical equivalence definitions


------- Additional Comments From sayamindu at gmail dot com  2009-08-17 12:18 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Refer the collation rules of UCA -
> http://www.unicode.org/Public/UCA/latest/allkeys.txt
> [...]
> 09CB  ; [.1B48.0020.0002.09CB] # BENGALI VOWEL SIGN O
> 09C7 09BE ; [.1B48.0020.0002.09CB] # BENGALI VOWEL SIGN O
> 09CC  ; [.1B49.0020.0002.09CC] # BENGALI VOWEL SIGN AU
> 09C7 09D7 ; [.1B49.0020.0002.09CC] # BENGALI VOWEL SIGN AU
> [...]
> 
> It is implemented in UCA and should be available in glibc localedata too. ie,
> Collation weights of canonically equivalent sequences should be explicitly
> defined in glibc and there should not be any assumption on the input to the
> collation.
> 

I would tend to second Santhosh here, since we do not know where the data might
be coming from (eg: someone might try to assume a shortcut while implementing a
legacy encoding -> unicode converter, etc)


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10501

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]