This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug math/2154] New: accuracy of cacoshl is bad.
- From: "aj at suse dot de" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 15 Jan 2006 18:02:14 -0000
- Subject: [Bug math/2154] New: accuracy of cacoshl is bad.
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
Adding these tests to math/libm-test.inc's cacosh_test gives upto 770 ULPs for
the long double tests:
TEST_c_c (cacosh, 0.3, 0.4, 0.405112337178030872507338405200229579L,
1.29016676450309079292712537938218583L);
TEST_c_c (cacosh, -0.3, 0.4, 0.405112337178030872507338405200229579L,
1.85142588908670244553551800389731705L);
TEST_c_c (cacosh, 0.3, -0.4, 0.405112337178030872507338405200229579L,
-1.29016676450309079292712537938218583L);
TEST_c_c (cacosh, -0.3, -0.4, 0.405112337178030872507338405200229579L,
-1.85142588908670244553551800389731705L);
the float and double tests pass, just long double has this problem.
--
Summary: accuracy of cacoshl is bad.
Product: glibc
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: math
AssignedTo: drepper at redhat dot com
ReportedBy: aj at suse dot de
CC: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
GCC build triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2154
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.