This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: question, re: gdb.base/label.exp

On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:21:28 +0100, Michael Snyder wrote:
>  <2><16e>: Abbrev Number: 8 (DW_TAG_label)
>      DW_AT_name        : here
>      DW_AT_decl_file   : 1
>      DW_AT_decl_line   : 16
************************** ^^ here should be 9
>      DW_AT_low_pc      : 0x4004e0
> 
> I'm using gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-50)

symbol_found() uses just SYMBOL_LINE.

The question is if we say this GCC is broken (and XFAIL it or move it to
gdb.dwarf2/) or whether GDB should use SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS.

I am for the latter, DWARF talks for DW_TAG_label about DW_AT_low_pc and not
about DW_AT_decl_line.


Thanks,
Jan
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]