This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [MI] -break-delete with several breakpoints
- From: Michael Snyder <msnyder at specifix dot com>
- To: Vladimir Prus <vladimir at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gdb at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:08:58 -0700
- Subject: Re: [MI] -break-delete with several breakpoints
- References: <email@example.com>
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 22:08 +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> I've noticed that right now, both -break-delete and -break-disable
> commands accept several breakpoint ids, like:
> -break-disable 1 2 3
> This behaviour comes almost by accident, and is not documented anywhere.
> The question is -- should we document it and add tests, or should we
> declare this behaviour does not exist?
> I think that most of the time, making use of this behaviour will require
> explicit code in the frontend, and the question is if that makes sense.
> Say, for -var-update accepting a list of variable object might be good idea,
> since the number of variable object can be significant, and they are updated
> on each step. For deleting and disabling breakpoints, I'm actually not sure.
> Typically, there are few breakpoints and wholesale delete is not common,
> so it's not worth optimizing for.
I'm guessing that this is an artifact of the fact that
the CLI commands (break, delete, enable, disable...)
are all willing to accept this type of argument list.