This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GDB in C++

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
Cc: gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 06:16:04 +0300
Subject: Re: GDB in C++
References: <00b601c7bda5$a5e6fa60$0a0a0a0a@DELORIAN> <1184183253.5515.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> <18069.13868.365370.13474@pkoning-laptop.equallogic.com> <m34pkabrmg.fsf@codesourcery.com> <20070711213153.GA3615@caradoc.them.org>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:31:53 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 01:41:11PM -0700, Jim Blandy wrote:
> > I wouldn't object to moving the internals documentation there.
> > High-level organization is pretty key to effective documentation,
> > though, so the wiki would need aggressive gardening.  It would
> > probably be good for it to have an appointed editor, to avoid ending
> > up with two or three competing theories for the overall organization.
> 
> For the record, I would object.  I think the internals manual is fine
> where it is, and would be no more likely to be expanded and kept up to
> date if it were moved.

Agreed.

References:
- RE: GDB in C++
  - From: Gary Funck
- RE: GDB in C++
  - From: Thiago Jung Bauermann
- RE: GDB in C++
  - From: Paul Koning
- Re: GDB in C++
  - From: Jim Blandy
- Re: GDB in C++
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]