This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: When will the gcc not include full path in the debug info

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
Cc: binary dot chen at gmail dot com, gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:17:52 -0500
Subject: Re: When will the gcc not include full path in the debug info
References: <4561b069.2356ae07.3fc8.466c@mx.google.com> <20061120140556.GB31834@nevyn.them.org> <uejrxop00.fsf@gnu.org>

On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 10:13:35PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> IIRC, there _is_ a way to do this: use COFF debug info (if you can).
> It has place only for the file name, not the leading directories.

The full pathname isn't the only thing you'd lose, I imagine!  Like
modern C++ support, macros, a routinely tested debug reader...

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- When will the gcc not include full path in the debug info
  - From: Bin Chen
- Re: When will the gcc not include full path in the debug info
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: When will the gcc not include full path in the debug info
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]