This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Source directory trees not in build location

From: Paul Koning <pkoning at equallogic dot com>
To: drow at false dot org
Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:36:59 -0500
Subject: Re: Source directory trees not in build location
References: <17449.46602.392697.675583@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20060328225733.GF9767@brasko.net> <20060329042138.GJ9767@brasko.net> <20060329223254.GA10302@nevyn.them.org>

>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:

 Daniel> On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 11:21:38PM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote:
 >> Sorry, should have posted this link, it probably makes more sense.
 >> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2005-08/msg00066.html
 >> 
 >> After reading it again, I'm not sure if this will solve Paul's
 >> problem.  Paul, do you think it would?

 Daniel> I don't think it will.

It doesn't look that way.  For one thing, my tools seem to produce
absolute paths, at least in the way we're using them.

	 paul

References:
- Source directory trees not in build location
  - From: Paul Koning
- Re: Source directory trees not in build location
  - From: Bob Rossi
- Re: Source directory trees not in build location
  - From: Bob Rossi
- Re: Source directory trees not in build location
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]