Re: bugzilla vs gnats (nee dejagnu :-)

[Andrew Cagney <cagney at redhat dot com>]

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 08:59:34PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
> > Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:
> >
> >
> > > I still want it to happen.  But I don't think anyone had decided what
> > > to do about all the GNATS PR numbers in DejaGNU; we could preserve
> > > them, but only by setting up a separate bugzilla installation, instead
> > > of sharing with the rest of sourceware (and I think sharing the
> > > installation would be in our best interests).
> >
> > Currently the highest GNATS PR number for gdb is 2096, which is much lower
> > than the highest PR number in the sourceware bugzilla, so it we would just
> > have to document that PR numbers < x refer to GNATS, everything else to
> > bugzilla.
>
>
> Yes, that is probably the best way.

Jim, this is the thread I was refering to,

I think the only potential question left here is gcc or sourceware (I'm 
guessing sourceware but it never hurts to put the question).

Andrew