This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Fwd: -Wpointer-sign for GCC 4.1

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb at red-bean dot com>
Cc: gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 06:31:02 +0200
Subject: Re: Fwd: -Wpointer-sign for GCC 4.1
References: <20060117211914.GA13055@nevyn.them.org> <39BD9F7D-F512-40EA-804A-DBE9BAC97E2B@apple.com> <20060118173155.GM28863@synopsys.com> <8f2776cb0601181040s4970ce9es15ebdcae50dccda2@mail.gmail.com> <20060118184426.GA10381@nevyn.them.org> <8f2776cb0601181058r23b810dg9d926e40f07d0704@mail.gmail.com> <20060118190120.GA11089@nevyn.them.org> <8f2776cb0601181650r71a193b7refdf1616a6ba760@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:50:42 -0800
> From: Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>
> 
> I think we should encourage the use of gdb_byte for binary blobs in
> new code (say, at patch review time).

100% agreement.

References:
- Fwd: -Wpointer-sign for GCC 4.1
  - From: Jim Blandy
- Re: Fwd: -Wpointer-sign for GCC 4.1
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Fwd: -Wpointer-sign for GCC 4.1
  - From: Jim Blandy
- Re: Fwd: -Wpointer-sign for GCC 4.1
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Fwd: -Wpointer-sign for GCC 4.1
  - From: Jim Blandy

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]