This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: "A word-aligned memory transfer mechanism is needed"


On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:09:16AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 18:58:56 -0800
> > From: Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>
> > 
> > Do folks agree that this is what that meant to say?  If we're not sure
> > what it means, we should take it out.
> 
> I'm not familiar with history, but your conclusions sound plausible.

Same from me, also.

I agree that the argument to m/M does not need to be word aligned, and
that this is worth writing down; I'm not sure whether we need a
word-sized I/O interface, but I agree that if we grow one, it should
not use the same m/M packets.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]