This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: break of time loop
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Efim Monjak <ymonyak at lipowsky dot de>
- Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:23:33 -0400
- Subject: Re: break of time loop
- References: <4360EFE7.6030406@lipowsky.de>
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 05:19:03PM +0200, Efim Monjak wrote:
> Hier a part of transcript and a part of ethereal protocol. they are
> from different sessions but I think it is the same case.
> The ctrl+c is sent before "step" command is responsed. The response for
> "step" is recognised as response for ctrl+c,
> possibly the trap signal don't means the loop processing is stopped.
> After it next "step" command is sent and the
> response for ctrl+c, which is sent at the same time with interrupt
> signal, is ignored.
> I hope you can understand my english:)
If you receive a C-c after sending a stop response, you should ignore
the C-c, not send another. Then this won't happen.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC