This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Invalid registers

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel at cup dot hp dot com>
Cc: Andrew STUBBS <andrew dot stubbs at st dot com>, GDB <gdb at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:51:33 -0400
Subject: Re: Invalid registers
References: <op.stq9spovo669wz@terrorhawk.bri.st.com> <20050711154926.GB30937@nevyn.them.org> <94cbbbf6ad84e632126e7a0e59830425@cup.hp.com>

On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 11:47:01AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> Given that registers are available when a value has been supplied,
> it's logical to assume (a priori) that a register is unavailable
> when no value has been supplied.

You are talking about a completely different meaning of unavailable
than Andrew was.  He's talking about unwinding, i.e. registers which
have been modified but not saved by an intervening stack frame.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Invalid registers
  - From: Marcel Moolenaar

References:
- Invalid registers
  - From: Andrew STUBBS
- Re: Invalid registers
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Invalid registers
  - From: Marcel Moolenaar

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]