This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: no stack trace with 2.6.11 and gdb 6.3

From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: Rich Coe <Richard dot Coe at med dot ge dot com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:05:32 -0700
Subject: Re: no stack trace with 2.6.11 and gdb 6.3
References: <20050610125855.62ce7313@godzilla> <20050610181140.GA6207@nevyn.them.org> <20050610135940.23bd015c@godzilla>

On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 01:59:40PM -0500, Rich Coe wrote:
> I downloaded the cvs snapshot gdb-6.3.50.20050607, built, and ran gdb 
> and the problem still persists.
> 
> What next ?
> 

Try this.

BTW, why does's gdb use

http://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/

It is very stupid not to.


H.J.
----
--- gdb/config/i386/linux64.mt.vdso	2004-11-11 16:47:07.000000000 -0800
+++ gdb/config/i386/linux64.mt	2005-02-01 13:01:46.056022932 -0800
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 # Target: GNU/Linux x86-64
 TDEPFILES= amd64-tdep.o amd64-linux-tdep.o \
 	i386-tdep.o i387-tdep.o i386-linux-tdep.o glibc-tdep.o \
-	solib.o solib-svr4.o corelow.o
+	solib.o solib-svr4.o corelow.o symfile-mem.o
 DEPRECATED_TM_FILE= solib.h

Follow-Ups:
- Re: no stack trace with 2.6.11 and gdb 6.3
  - From: Christopher Faylor
- Re: no stack trace with 2.6.11 and gdb 6.3
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: no stack trace with 2.6.11 and gdb 6.3
  - From: Rich Coe

References:
- no stack trace with 2.6.11 and gdb 6.3
  - From: Rich Coe
- Re: no stack trace with 2.6.11 and gdb 6.3
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: no stack trace with 2.6.11 and gdb 6.3
  - From: Rich Coe

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]