This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Still problems with gdb and nested functions.
- From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Paul Hilfinger <hilfingr at EECS dot Berkeley dot EDU>
- Cc: 999alfred at comcast dot net, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:51:32 +0200
- Subject: Re: Still problems with gdb and nested functions.
- References: <200502222015.j1MKFB1q017797@tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:15:11 -0800
> From: Paul Hilfinger <hilfingr@EECS.Berkeley.EDU>
>
> > No symbol "k" in current context.
>
> I presume you have confirmed that k is actually there (since it is set
> only from a constant, it could be folded away even without fancy
> optimization).
AFAIK, GCC never optimizes _anything_ under -O0, not even redundant
register reloads.
Anyway, the disassembly I posted shows that k does in fact exist and
is stored on the stack, as expected.