This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Cc: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,GDB <gdb at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 15:09:45 -0500
- Subject: Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base
- References: <20041231163806.GA1335@lucon.org> <Pine.LNX.4.60.0412311158280.27590@dberlin.org> <20041231184405.GA2182@lucon.org> <Pine.LNX.4.60.0412311451060.6844@dberlin.org> <Pine.LNX.4.60.0412311509360.6844@dberlin.org> <20041231215010.GA5722@lucon.org> <20041231215443.GA5853@lucon.org> <Pine.LNX.4.60.0412311656360.6844@dberlin.org> <20041231220324.GA5987@lucon.org> <20050101191459.GA23014@lucon.org>
On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 11:15:00AM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> The modified patch works with tls_symbolic_operand in i386. However,
> I do see
>
> <2><427491>: Abbrev Number: 39 (DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine)
> DW_AT_sibling : <427510>
> DW_AT_abstract_origin: <427159>
> DW_AT_low_pc : 0x8399aea
> DW_AT_high_pc : 0x8399b3c
> <3><4274a2>: Abbrev Number: 37 (DW_TAG_formal_parameter)
> DW_AT_abstract_origin: <42716b>
> <3><4274a7>: Abbrev Number: 37 (DW_TAG_formal_parameter)
> DW_AT_abstract_origin: <427177>
Do the abstract origins have locations? Otherwise, that's a problem...
--
Daniel Jacobowitz