This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Proposal: offset based member name (or type) lookup


On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 12:25:37PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 06:56:05PM +0100, Christoph Jaeschke wrote:
> Hi,
> > I would like to propose a offset based member name lookup of
> structs/classes. Assume:
> > struct X {
> int a;
> int b;
> };
> > struct Y {
> struct X x[4];
> int c;
> };
> > struct Z {
> Y y;
> };
> > If you apply a patch for gdb 6.0 I've prepared, you can ask gdb by
> > ptype Z + 28
> > about Z's relative name at offset 28
> > .y.x[3].b
> > using
> > ptype Z+28, typechain
> > gdb will append also the typechain
> > .y.x[3].b, typechain = ::Y::X[4]::int
> > > There may be a better suited command than 'ptype' for it, it was choosen > just because it was the simplest way to add it.
> > The patch contains also a caching mechanism, speeding up a lot if you do > many lookups in big nested structures. It has a minimal memory > requirement and will not hurt for single lookups.
> > The patch can be send if you are interested in.


Well, I don't like the syntax, but I think this is a wonderful idea.
The other feature I've been meaning to add since forever is a variant
of ptype which shows byte offsets for every field.

The problem with using ptype is that "Z+28" already has a meaning; gdb
will try to add the two, or call an overloaded + operator in C++, et
cetera.  This should probably be a new command; that'll be more useful
for MI anyway.

I did filed a copyright assignment form now. The patch can be send, no problem, but perhaps there should be consensus about the user interface. Should a new command name be created? Is the typechain print ok?

Christoph Jaeschke


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]