This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: libtgdb or libgdb
- From: Bob Rossi <bob at brasko dot net>
- To: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 20:54:06 -0400
- Subject: Re: libtgdb or libgdb
- References: <20030711023410.GA10222@white>
Was the Email below ignored because of bad timing ( 6.0 ) release?
Or because no one is interested in the idea? I find it very frustrating
when there is not a single response.
Bob Rossi
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 10:34:10PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As some of you may know, I am working on a front end to gdb called cgdb.
> In order to communicate with gdb, I wrote a library called libtgdb (
> Trivial gdb ). This gives a simple interface for the front end to work
> with. Thus, completely separating the gdb-specific code from the front
> end.
>
> As of know, libtgdb supports annotate level 2 communication. Starting
> next month, I plan to add mi support. It can end up supporting annotate
> level 1 if necessary in the future.
>
> Since I have been subscribed to the gdb list, I have seen many inquiries
> about libgdb. Which seems to be no longer supported. I was thinking that
> it might be reasonable to have libtgdb be shipped with gdb's sources as
> a library that any front end can use to interface with gdb. Of course it
> would be as general purpose as possible, and capable of supporting all
> of gdb's features when complete.
>
> One major difference between libtgdb and libgdb is that
> 1. libtgdb is a separate library, not linked against gdb's sources.
> 2. libtgdb does not have to be compiled to work with a single gdb,
> it is backwards compatible and will work with any gdb.
>
> What does everyone think? Does this make any sense? Is this too ambitious?
>
> My main goal, is too make front end's able to integrate with gdb easily.
> I have spent *far* to much time trying to figure out the gdb specific
> stuff. It just doesn't make sense reproducing the code in all of the
> front ends. They all end up having there own bugs, which is *very* annoying.
> In general, the quality of front ends could be improved, if developers
> were not trying to figure out the tricks of getting gdb to do certain
> things.
>
> Thanks,
> Bob Rossi