This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfc] struct dictionary
- From: David Carlton <carlton at math dot stanford dot edu>
- To: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>, dcarlton at bactrian dot org, Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>, gdb <gdb at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: 02 Jun 2003 20:00:05 -0700
- Subject: Re: [rfc] struct dictionary
- References: <ro1he8y9pim.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU><3EA89AB3.6050403@redhat.com> <ro1znmf8a9g.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU><3EA954D7.2070207@redhat.com> <ro17k9ibkii.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU><3EB1A916.9060700@redhat.com> <3EBD4054.2070805@redhat.com><16092.1842.33604.377224@localhost.redhat.com>
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:25:54 -0400, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com> said:
> Andrew Cagney writes:
>>> Is it ok to remove BLOCK_SHOULD_SORT how?
> a thousand and one, and two, and three...sold to the old lady in the
> pink suit...
> Sure.
> David, do you want to resuscitate your old patch? Consider it preapproved.
Honesly, I don't see too much urgency in doing it if the dictionary
patch doesn't get approved. (The dictionary patch would make
BLOCK_SHOULD_SORT obsolete.) If it's bothering anybody else, I'll get
rid of BLOCK_SHOULD_SORT now, but otherwise I'll just wait for a
verdict on the dictionary patch.
David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu