Re: long long considered harmful?

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>]

> > Was that really so hard?  And it's a lot clearer.
>
>
> Well, it's not really that hard.  I'm just being grumpy because it's snowing
> outside and I really want to get this stuff committed one of these days.
> I'd already done that to our i386 stuff both to remove the dependency on the
> structure and to account for our weird ordering of registers.  See snippet
> below:

I thought snow was one of Canada's two main exports?

More seriously, a things-to-do-today item is to add to gdb (well 
immediatly remote.c) code that reads in a regformats file, and then uses 
that to unpack a raw target byte-ordered (or network ordered?) buffer.

Kris, that problem sounds very similar to what you're doing here.

Andrew