Re: `chain-frame'

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>]

> > This unwinds to the ``inner most frame''.  Instead of calling 
> > create_new_frame(), get_current_frame() creates this frame and then 
> > unwinds it.
>
> Oh, er.  Right, I should have understood that by now.  Thank you.
If I was ever granted a wish allowing me to change one (pair) of gdb 
commands, up/down would be it.

> > Oops, yes.  Just:
> >
> > 	chain-frame:
> >
> > though I think.
>
> This'll require playing around with my vocabulary a little to get used
> to it, but I can buy it.  The general action is "unwinding"; looking
> for the "chain" is one mechanism.  I like it.
Er, actually, I've, hopefully, got a beter idea:

	extras-frame

It reflects how the original frame code would use INIT_EXTRA_FRAME_INFO 
during initialization.

Thing is, the phrase `frame chain' is just too useful when describing 
the [er] frame chain (all the frames strung together).

Andrew